Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Farahnik

Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Long Beach, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1699209254 CMS profile 5703522

3828 Schaufele Ave Ste 300, Long Beach, CA 90808

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$198,454

852 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Farahnik of Long Beach, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $198,454 across 852 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $174,190 398
2024 General $19,054 219
2023 General $3,199 156
2022 General $1,630 69
2021 General $131 6
2020 General $137 3
2019 General $112 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Farahnik
  • Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology median
  • Middle half of Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Farahnik were reported at $174,190. Among 32 Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,254 and the middle half received between $445 and $4,549.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Farahnik Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $112 $660 $180–$2,230 $163
2020 $137 $432 $119–$1,020 $114
2021 $131 $883 $156–$1,571 $132
2022 $1,630 $1,038 $99–$1,992 $149
2023 $3,199 $1,108 $199–$2,848 $160
2024 $19,054 $1,001 $122–$1,882 $164
2025 $174,190 $1,254 $445–$4,549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $76,013 210 payments
  2. Botanix SB Inc $55,915 57 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $53,525 83 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $2,641 122 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $1,733 41 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,254 38 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $985 37 payments
  8. LEO Pharma Inc. $900 36 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $774 26 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $681 26 payments
  11. Other $4,034 176 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $160,728 50 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $20,792 732 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $9,230 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $7,584 65 payments
  5. Education $120 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bimzelx $75,695 177 payments
  2. SOFDRA $55,915 57 payments
  3. Otezla $44,723 74 payments
  4. DUPIXENT $2,343 56 payments
  5. SOTYKTU $1,249 37 payments
  6. RINVOQ $1,176 56 payments
  7. TREMFYA $941 35 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $935 37 payments
  9. ADBRY $870 35 payments
  10. TALTZ $586 24 payments
  11. Other $7,857 384 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

853

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$80,936

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

8.4%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 17 $61,708
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 121 $5,763
Ketoconazole Generic 231 $3,688
Metronidazole Generic 52 $2,325
Tacrolimus Generic 16 $1,188
Fluocinolone Acetonide Fluocinolone/Shower Cap Brand 11 $1,040
Ciclopirox Ciclopirox Olamine Brand 44 $907
Fluorouracil Generic 12 $729
Fluocinonide Generic 15 $572
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 20 $498

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$310,832

Of which drugs: $10,009

Medicare patients

814

Average age 76

Services billed

7,944

316 women, 498 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 17%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 16 27 $8,372
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 39 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
$14,396 — —
DUPIXENT
$827 17 —
SKYRIZI
$528 — —
SOTYKTU
$413 — —
Bimzelx
$354 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

852 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record