Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Cook

Family Medicine Jefferson City, MO Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679998975 CMS profile 610134

1241 W Stadium Blvd, Jefferson City, MO 65109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,340

690 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,812,036 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Cook of Jefferson City, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,340 across 690 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,812,036 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,211 136
2024 General $2,062 123
2023 General $1,776 132
2022 General $1,782 126
2021 General $1,058 78
2020 General $312 16
2019 General $1,140 79

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Cook
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Cook were reported at $2,211. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Cook Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,140 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $312 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,058 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,782 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,776 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,062 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,211 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,724 120 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $1,378 121 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $929 41 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $820 58 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $812 61 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $656 52 payments
  7. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $283 16 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $279 17 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $258 8 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $257 17 payments
  11. Other $2,946 179 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,340 690 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $883 84 payments
  2. UBRELVY $880 51 payments
  3. QULIPTA $752 39 payments
  4. ZAVZPRET $617 56 payments
  5. FARXIGA $558 17 payments
  6. Repatha $473 36 payments
  7. Otezla $468 36 payments
  8. Ozempic $393 32 payments
  9. BREZTRI $380 16 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $338 40 payments
  11. Other $8,954 611 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 181 drugs

Part D claims

15,300

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,422,964

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

20.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 129 $170,886
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 151 $167,973
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 154 $132,494
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 118 $126,602
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 121 $104,842
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 55 $67,639
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 51 $67,170
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 49 $50,827
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 70 $41,435
Prolia Denosumab Brand 20 $32,273

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 181 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 113 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$194,371

Of which drugs: $39,292

Medicare patients

473

Average age 73

Services billed

6,384

162 women, 311 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 21%
COPD 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 144 145 $11,805
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 65 65 $9,736
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 20 20 $5,786

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 35 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$153 — —
NURTEC ODT
$139 — —
UBRELVY
$136 — —
QULIPTA
$115 — —
ZAVZPRET
$109 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 35 with Patron

Records

690 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record