Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Bogucki

Dermatology Columbus, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1740438423 CMS profile 811355

150 Taylor Station Rd, Suite 250, Columbus, OH 43213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,780

923 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,318

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,960,606 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Bogucki of Columbus, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,780 across 923 general payments and $5,318 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,960,606 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,393 213
2024 General $2,546 212
2023 General $1,782 115
2022 General $2,452 111
2021 General $562 73
2021 Research $5,318 1
2020 General $413 24
2019 General $2,633 175

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Bogucki
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Bogucki were reported at $3,393. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Bogucki Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,633 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $413 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $562 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,452 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,782 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,546 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,393 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,319 220 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,909 52 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,454 129 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,161 114 payments
  5. LEO Pharma Inc. $780 49 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $719 48 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $641 32 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $551 34 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $497 20 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $496 30 payments
  11. Other $3,253 195 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,262 914 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,180 1 payment
  3. Education $338 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $986 68 payments
  2. CIBINQO $890 80 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $884 90 payments
  4. RINVOQ $813 92 payments
  5. DUPIXENT $797 38 payments
  6. EUCRISA $669 65 payments
  7. LITFULO $637 62 payments
  8. HUMIRA $554 31 payments
  9. Otezla $551 34 payments
  10. ADBRY $545 37 payments
  11. Other $7,411 587 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,318 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

1,207

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$261,862

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

10.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 18 $129,126
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 19 $101,988
Betamethasone Diprop Augmented Betamethasone/Propylene Glyc Brand 60 $5,173
Metronidazole Generic 31 $3,471
Fluocinonide Generic 74 $3,137
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 213 $2,445
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 61 $2,427
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 204 $2,356
Tacrolimus Generic 11 $2,284
Ketoconazole Generic 140 $2,170

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 69 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$274,151

Of which drugs: $1,042

Medicare patients

688

Average age 75

Services billed

4,327

368 women, 320 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 27 41 $28

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$312 — —
DUPIXENT
$255 19 —
TALTZ
$193 — —
SKYRIZI
$189 — —
Bimzelx
$188 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

924 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record