Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Blossom

Cardiovascular Disease Tupelo, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1477648087 CMS profile 21172

499 Gloster Creek Vlg, Suite A-2, Tupelo, MS 38801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,584

189 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$84,729 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Blossom of Tupelo, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,584 across 189 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $84,729 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,298 49
2024 General $1,374 38
2023 General $1,453 41
2022 General $777 20
2021 General $577 16
2020 General $455 7
2019 General $649 18

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Blossom
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Blossom were reported at $1,298. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Blossom Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $649 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $455 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $577 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $777 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $1,453 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $1,374 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $1,298 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $1,006 35 payments
  2. Abiomed $959 17 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $481 6 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $387 21 payments
  5. Penumbra, Inc. $376 5 payments
  6. Cook Medical LLC $322 5 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $292 6 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $232 13 payments
  9. AngioDynamics, Inc. $224 2 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $224 7 payments
  11. Other $2,081 72 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,530 188 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $54 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Impella $857 13 payments
  2. VERQUVO $473 25 payments
  3. ONYX FRONTIER $459 6 payments
  4. Indigo System $376 5 payments
  5. SYMPLICITY G3 $239 18 payments
  6. ALPHAVAC $224 2 payments
  7. CAMZYOS $205 10 payments
  8. FARXIGA $198 5 payments
  9. Zilver PTX $194 2 payments
  10. Bashir Endovascular Catheter $188 2 payments
  11. Other $3,405 118 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 47 drugs

Part D claims

4,422

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$525,524

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

26.5%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 258 $240,903
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 100 $78,344
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 78 $71,643
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 39 $27,656
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 26 $18,751
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 13 $16,877
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 17 $13,746
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 98 $12,506
Ezetimibe Generic 211 $5,189
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 509 $4,766

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 47 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 96 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$296,182

Of which drugs: $8,714

Medicare patients

1,466

Average age 75

Services billed

5,491

679 women, 787 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 40%
Atrial fibrillation 36%
Heart failure 32%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
COPD 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 27 108 $586

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $86
$86 — —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $45
$45 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $35
$35 100 —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $17
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$33 258 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $5
$5 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

189 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record