Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Beatric Muma

Nurse Practitioner Hanover, MD Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1972079879 CMS profile 11200612

7580 Buckingham Blvd Ste 110, Hanover, MD 21076

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,211

399 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Beatric Muma of Hanover, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,211 across 399 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,149 98
2024 General $2,130 85
2023 General $2,209 76
2022 General $1,874 71
2021 General $1,850 69

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Beatric Muma
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Beatric Muma were reported at $2,149. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Beatric Muma Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,850 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,874 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $2,209 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $2,130 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $2,149 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,233 37 payments
  2. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $974 42 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $805 32 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $799 32 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $486 19 payments
  6. Antares Pharma, Inc. $440 19 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $404 19 payments
  8. Urovant Sciences Inc $388 20 payments
  9. Cipla USA Inc. $371 1 payment
  10. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. $370 17 payments
  11. Other $3,943 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,871 394 payments
  2. Education $340 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. ERLEADA $1,253 38 payments
  2. GEMTESA $1,080 48 payments
  3. Nubeqa $779 31 payments
  4. Xofigo $590 24 payments
  5. XIAFLEX $531 26 payments
  6. KEYTRUDA $486 19 payments
  7. XTANDI $441 21 payments
  8. AVEED $419 25 payments
  9. ORGOVYX $373 17 payments
  10. ZEMDRI (PLAZOMICIN) $371 1 payment
  11. Other $6,334 278 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 20 drugs

Part D claims

1,212

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$590,575

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

52.2%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 31 $461,625
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 77 $55,070
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 48 $30,329
Premarin Estrogens, Conjugated Brand 27 $11,827
Alfuzosin Hcl Er Alfuzosin Hcl Brand 286 $8,256
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 232 $4,603
Finasteride Generic 166 $2,613
Potassium Citrate Er Potassium Citrate Brand 29 $2,602
Solifenacin Succinate Generic 23 $2,393
Testosterone Generic 11 $2,168

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 20 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$323,639

Of which drugs: $197,817

Medicare patients

772

Average age 74

Services billed

41,477

258 women, 514 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Cancer 27%
Depression 23%
COPD 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 21 3,840 $79,181
Leuprolide acetate (for depot suspension), 7.5 mg J9217 Office 31 294 $40,813
Injection, testosterone undecanoate, 1 mg J3145 Office 12 28,500 $40,678
Bcg live intravesical instillation, 1 mg J9030 Office 20 2,600 $5,359
Injection, gemcitabine hydrochloride, 200 mg J9201 Office 13 165 $399

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $243
$243 48 —
PYLARIFY
  • Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $227
$227 — —
ERLEADA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $204
$204 — —
ORGOVYX
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $124
  • PFIZER INC. $19
$143 — —
Nubeqa
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $100
$100 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

399 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record