Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Baha Abu-Esheh

Neurology Ardmore, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1619909934 CMS profile 300101

908 N Rockford Rd Ste A, Ardmore, OK 73401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$229,878

1,094 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,063

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$43,113 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, Baha Abu-Esheh of Ardmore, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $229,878 across 1,094 general payments and $5,063 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $43,113 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,695 134
2024 General $1,875 103
2024 Research $5,063 1
2023 General $11,603 128
2022 General $13,877 174
2021 General $16,667 151
2020 General $76,199 180
2019 General $106,963 224

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Baha Abu-Esheh
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Baha Abu-Esheh were reported at $2,695. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Baha Abu-Esheh Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $106,963 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $76,199 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $16,667 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $13,877 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $11,603 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $1,875 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $2,695 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $113,401 149 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $47,628 106 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $42,069 53 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $7,866 108 payments
  5. Eli Lilly and Company $7,350 1 payment
  6. UCB, Inc. $1,666 110 payments
  7. LivaNova USA, Inc. $1,529 45 payments
  8. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,027 71 payments
  9. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $718 42 payments
  10. SK Life Science, Inc. $657 40 payments
  11. Other $5,968 369 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $164,006 86 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $24,883 69 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $23,563 6 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $17,271 925 payments
  5. Education $155 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AIMOVIG $113,601 161 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $40,137 39 payments
  3. EMGALITY $25,640 76 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $7,503 34 payments
  5. REYVOW $1,438 12 payments
  6. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR $922 22 payments
  7. Briviact $815 57 payments
  8. INGREZZA $698 41 payments
  9. QULIPTA $641 64 payments
  10. Nayzilam $482 31 payments
  11. Other $8,736 536 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $5,063 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

1,555

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$591,670

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

26.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 222 $315,717
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 28 $43,197
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 24 $30,966
Nayzilam Midazolam Brand 25 $29,477
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 14 $29,131
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 23 $27,104
Lacosamide Generic 183 $26,716
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 15 $26,603
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 14 $24,165
Nuvigil Armodafinil Brand 11 $12,098

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$727,444

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

1,456

Average age 71

Services billed

6,945

821 women, 635 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 37%
Depression 36%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
COPD 24%
Atrial fibrillation 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$172 — —
Nayzilam
$134 25 —
QULIPTA
$121 — —
Briviact
$119 222 —
UBRELVY
$116 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,095 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record