Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Babu Kumar

Internal Medicine Hamden, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1295721942 CMS profile 148917

2543 Dixwell Ave, Hamden, CT 06514

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,198

868 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Babu Kumar of Hamden, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,198 across 868 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,522 113
2024 General $2,458 116
2023 General $2,481 117
2022 General $2,257 133
2021 General $2,208 127
2020 General $1,576 91
2019 General $2,696 171

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Babu Kumar
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Babu Kumar were reported at $2,522. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Babu Kumar Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,696 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,576 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,208 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,257 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,481 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,458 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,522 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,446 112 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,634 84 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,433 85 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,173 81 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,086 57 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,071 53 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $769 41 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $594 32 payments
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $438 27 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $412 16 payments
  11. Other $5,142 280 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,939 858 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $180 2 payments
  3. Education $49 7 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,151 49 payments
  2. BREZTRI $1,088 43 payments
  3. Ozempic $932 47 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $843 45 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $802 50 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $793 40 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $748 33 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $698 45 payments
  9. Otezla $626 33 payments
  10. Repatha $620 33 payments
  11. Other $13,203 764 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 183 drugs

Part D claims

15,985

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,580,989

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 192 $201,904
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 203 $201,169
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 169 $165,303
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 124 $160,873
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 134 $143,464
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 90 $89,363
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 43 $50,812
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 48 $47,072
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 49 $40,642
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 34 $38,106

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 183 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$141,956

Of which drugs: $6,985

Medicare patients

436

Average age 70

Services billed

1,953

224 women, 212 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 39%
Arthritis 35%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
COPD 21%
Depression 19%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 12 12 $3,496
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 37 37 $2,746
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 19 35 $36

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$393 124 —
BREZTRI
$316 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$206 — —
LEQVIO
$183 — —
FARXIGA
$154 203 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

868 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record