Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Babak Yasmeh

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Corona, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1417392622 CMS profile 1391126

2250 S Main St Ste 201, Corona, CA 92882

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$59,439

272 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$11,894 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Babak Yasmeh of Corona, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $59,439 across 272 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $11,894 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,173 60
2024 General $7,135 38
2023 General $8,658 79
2022 General $10,163 46
2021 General $8,067 29
2020 General $11,924 16
2019 General $7,319 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Babak Yasmeh
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Babak Yasmeh were reported at $6,173. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Babak Yasmeh Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,319 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $11,924 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $8,067 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $10,163 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $8,658 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $7,135 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $6,173 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $27,007 154 payments
  2. Biotronik Inc. $11,710 38 payments
  3. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $10,427 3 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $7,371 15 payments
  5. Biosense Webster, Inc. $1,378 35 payments
  6. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $573 2 payments
  7. Medtronic, Inc. $376 4 payments
  8. Impulse Dynamics (USA) Inc. $143 1 payment
  9. Pfizer Inc. $110 4 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $89 3 payments
  11. Other $254 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Grant $21,032 7 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $19,687 54 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $10,296 203 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,350 7 payments
  5. Education $74 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BioMonitor $7,043 14 payments
  2. Solia $6,944 12 payments
  3. AVEIR Cardiac Rhythm Management $5,799 20 payments
  4. Acticor 7 VR-T DX $5,133 4 payments
  5. Rivacor 7 DR-T $5,053 4 payments
  6. Edora 8 DR-T $4,916 2 payments
  7. EMBLEM S ICD ELECTRODE DELIVERY SYSTEM $3,750 1 payment
  8. AVEIR Structural Heart $3,500 1 payment
  9. Edora $3,151 12 payments
  10. Acticor $3,151 12 payments
  11. Other $29,307 232 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

940

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$410,772

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

43.4%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 339 $354,224
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 32 $34,903
Dofetilide Generic 55 $7,701
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 231 $4,390
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 170 $3,826
Dabigatran Etexilate Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate Brand 11 $3,632
Flecainide Acetate Generic 28 $786
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 12 $449
Digoxin Generic 16 $367
Sotalol Sotalol Hcl Brand 14 $206

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$29,947

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

228

Average age 77

Services billed

523

108 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 69%
Ischemic heart disease 55%
Heart failure 54%
Arthritis 54%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Diabetes 37%
COPD 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VYNDAQEL
  • PFIZER INC. $25
$25 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

272 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record