Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Avinash Shah

Internal Medicine Charlotte, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1841269925 CMS profile 220098

7108 Pineville Matthews Rd, Suite 102, Charlotte, NC 28226

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,744

721 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$390,331 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Avinash Shah of Charlotte, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,744 across 721 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $390,331 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,270 63
2024 General $3,106 103
2023 General $2,074 103
2022 General $1,992 116
2021 General $2,277 139
2020 General $1,592 98
2019 General $1,433 99

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Avinash Shah
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Avinash Shah were reported at $1,270. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Avinash Shah Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,433 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,592 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,277 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,992 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,074 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,106 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,270 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,952 47 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,874 113 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,787 98 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,324 78 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $907 48 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $855 46 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $499 30 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $455 29 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $383 14 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $329 21 payments
  11. Other $3,379 197 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,748 715 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $925 2 payments
  3. Education $72 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KRYSTEXXA $1,219 4 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,166 74 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,163 65 payments
  4. FARXIGA $832 38 payments
  5. JARDIANCE Diabetes $728 42 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $512 28 payments
  7. Repatha $475 29 payments
  8. JARDIANCE Diabetes $438 20 payments
  9. BELSOMRA $430 27 payments
  10. STEGLATRO $421 27 payments
  11. Other $11,339 672 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 111 drugs

Part D claims

4,768

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$482,207

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

15.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 92 $116,624
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 46 $55,876
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 61 $55,079
Trientine Hcl Generic 11 $34,618
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 20 $34,519
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 30 $30,864
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 25 $29,165
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 17 $26,885
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 16 $15,221
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 13 $14,394

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 111 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 75 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$119,216

Of which drugs: $16,524

Medicare patients

105

Average age 73

Services billed

2,666

62 women, 43 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Osteoporosis 33%
Diabetes 32%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 11 11 $1,528
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 20 20 $490
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 120 $89

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
$1,200 — —
JARDIANCE
$219 92 —
RYBELSUS
$132 — —
Ozempic
$132 46 —
MOUNJARO
$120 17 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

721 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record