Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Austin Bell

Glaucoma Specialist Rogers, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1093008302 CMS profile 1353332

3737 W Walnut St, Rogers, AR 72756

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,500

230 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$24,730 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Austin Bell of Rogers, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,500 across 230 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $24,730 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Glaucoma Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $13,460 50
2024 General $1,191 44
2023 General $743 34
2022 General $680 29
2021 General $5,394 44
2020 General $1,713 6
2019 General $2,319 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Austin Bell
  • Glaucoma Specialist median
  • Middle half of Glaucoma Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Austin Bell were reported at $13,460. Among 370 Glaucoma Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $597 and the middle half received between $244 and $1,607.

Show as a table
Year Austin Bell Glaucoma Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $2,319 $433 $150–$1,170 $163
2020 $1,713 $242 $74–$693 $114
2021 $5,394 $324 $122–$936 $132
2022 $680 $399 $121–$1,081 $149
2023 $743 $458 $190–$1,208 $160
2024 $1,191 $558 $215–$1,359 $164
2025 $13,460 $597 $244–$1,607 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $8,873 21 payments
  2. Ivantis, Inc $7,800 9 payments
  3. Glaukos Corporation $4,431 18 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,121 54 payments
  5. Alcon Vision LLC $675 24 payments
  6. RxSight Inc $486 9 payments
  7. The Cameron-Ehlen Group, Inc. $416 6 payments
  8. Allergan Inc. $318 26 payments
  9. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $298 26 payments
  10. Carl Zeiss Meditec USA, Inc. $293 1 payment
  11. Other $791 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $16,630 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,650 207 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,839 13 payments
  4. Long term medical supply or device loan $293 1 payment
  5. Entertainment $62 1 payment
  6. Honoraria $26 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Hydrus Microstent $4,345 5 payments
  2. Hydrus $3,455 4 payments
  3. DURYSTA $611 32 payments
  4. RXSIGHT LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE (LDD) $438 7 payments
  5. RXSIGHT CONTACT LENS $438 7 payments
  6. RXSIGHT INJECTOR CARTRIDGE $438 7 payments
  7. RXSIGHT INJECTOR HANDPIECE $438 7 payments
  8. LUMIGAN $390 19 payments
  9. LIGHT ADJUSTABLE LENS (LAL) $378 4 payments
  10. IOLMaster 700 $353 2 payments
  11. Other $4,039 180 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

3,780

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$130,119

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

33.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 489 $17,401
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 42 $16,525
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 56 $11,131
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 451 $9,687
Latanoprost Generic 793 $7,277
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 18 $7,150
Rhopressa Netarsudil Mesylate Brand 18 $6,880
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 44 $6,696
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 18 $6,642
Fluorometholone Generic 86 $6,510

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$429,568

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

843

Average age 76

Services billed

3,810

467 women, 376 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $247
$247 — —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $47
$47 42 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $45
$45 — —
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $38
$38 — —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

230 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Glaucoma Specialist in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record