Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Aurelio Torres Consuegra

Internal Medicine Pembroke Pines, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1376720458 CMS profile 108090

18503 Pines Blvd Ste 306, Ste 205, Pembroke Pines, FL 33029

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,202

326 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,769,914 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Aurelio Torres Consuegra of Pembroke Pines, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,202 across 326 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,769,914 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $872 40
2024 General $949 44
2023 General $1,023 52
2022 General $686 34
2021 General $800 46
2020 General $1,065 58
2019 General $809 52

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Aurelio Torres Consuegra
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Aurelio Torres Consuegra were reported at $872. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Aurelio Torres Consuegra Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $809 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,065 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $800 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $686 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,023 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $949 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $872 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $737 45 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $595 34 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $547 28 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $508 26 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $419 20 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $393 18 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $380 30 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $237 12 payments
  9. Exact Sciences Corporation $234 11 payments
  10. Shield Therapeutics Inc $192 6 payments
  11. Other $1,960 96 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,167 320 payments
  2. Education $35 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $456 23 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $375 19 payments
  3. SYNTHROID $283 18 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT $276 12 payments
  5. FARXIGA $275 15 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $258 13 payments
  7. UBRELVY $250 17 payments
  8. Cologuard Collection Kit $234 11 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $229 11 payments
  10. Vascepa $227 15 payments
  11. Other $5,310 276 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 138 drugs

Part D claims

8,533

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$753,824

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

16.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 67 $98,203
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 78 $96,122
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 71 $78,099
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 45 $67,668
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 46 $49,593
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 33 $49,061
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 31 $39,506
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 18 $36,603
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 12 $34,590
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 25 $22,654

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 138 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,534

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

125

Average age 74

Services billed

1,331

69 women, 56 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 39%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 22%
COPD 20%
Osteoporosis 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $67
$67 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $67
$67 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $51
$51 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28
  • Lilly USA, LLC $21
$49 67 —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $45
$45 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

326 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record