Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Aubrey Hartmann

Dermatology Cedar Park, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1194713933 CMS profile 281257

1401 Medical Pkwy, Building B, Suite 300, Cedar Park, TX 78613

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$230,194

1,536 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Aubrey Hartmann of Cedar Park, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $230,194 across 1,536 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $71,382 269
2024 General $71,707 323
2023 General $39,183 263
2022 General $34,851 266
2021 General $3,854 173
2020 General $2,289 105
2019 General $6,929 137

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Aubrey Hartmann
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Aubrey Hartmann were reported at $71,382. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Aubrey Hartmann Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $6,929 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,289 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $3,854 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $34,851 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $39,183 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $71,707 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $71,382 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $125,087 359 payments
  2. LEO Pharma Inc. $31,412 76 payments
  3. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $18,758 98 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $12,370 258 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $6,402 42 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $6,348 92 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $5,176 64 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $3,918 77 payments
  9. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $3,610 38 payments
  10. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $2,940 43 payments
  11. Other $14,172 389 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $121,423 52 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $55,052 36 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $36,249 1,364 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $16,630 65 payments
  5. Education $840 19 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $83,713 180 payments
  2. ADBRY $27,136 57 payments
  3. SKYRIZI Immunology $26,258 133 payments
  4. NEMLUVIO $17,365 33 payments
  5. TREMFYA $12,032 209 payments
  6. ANZUPGO $11,406 17 payments
  7. SKYRIZI Immunology $8,510 14 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Immunology $4,413 35 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $3,489 55 payments
  10. SILIQ $2,988 15 payments
  11. Other $29,156 1,026 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

2,171

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$258,617

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 39 $162,730
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 12 $44,726
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 146 $7,565
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 302 $7,479
Ketoconazole Generic 271 $4,583
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 110 $4,305
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 208 $3,302
Acitretin Generic 13 $3,241
Minoxidil Generic 285 $2,744
Fluorouracil Generic 44 $2,558

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$406,517

Of which drugs: $1,936

Medicare patients

1,050

Average age 76

Services billed

9,160

480 women, 570 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 16%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Osteoporosis 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 11 20 $47
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 34 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$25,055 — —
SKYRIZI
$20,857 — —
ADBRY
$15,054 — —
TREMFYA
$811 — —
DUPIXENT
$435 51 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,536 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record