Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Atit Shah

Pain Medicine Sheboygan, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1487881108 CMS profile 1060608

2124 Kohler Memorial Dr Ste 110, Sheboygan, WI 53081

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$75,706

677 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$465

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,983 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Atit Shah of Sheboygan, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $75,706 across 677 general payments and $465 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,983 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,608 91
2024 General $47,222 143
2023 General $10,165 97
2022 General $4,517 93
2021 General $3,024 96
2020 General $2,101 69
2020 Research $410 1
2019 General $3,069 88
2019 Research $55 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Atit Shah
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Atit Shah were reported at $5,608. Among 757 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $470 and the middle half received between $146 and $1,462.

Show as a table
Year Atit Shah Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,069 $506 $144–$1,566 $163
2020 $2,101 $315 $96–$934 $114
2021 $3,024 $452 $134–$1,237 $132
2022 $4,517 $475 $124–$1,407 $149
2023 $10,165 $480 $136–$1,384 $160
2024 $47,222 $521 $164–$1,511 $164
2025 $5,608 $470 $146–$1,462 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SI-BONE, Inc. $55,020 73 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $2,132 71 payments
  3. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $2,070 33 payments
  4. Medtronic USA, Inc. $2,004 52 payments
  5. SPR Therapeutics, Inc $1,901 83 payments
  6. Nevro Corp. $1,786 37 payments
  7. Genesys Orthopedics Systems, L.L.C. $1,534 7 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,453 49 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $1,387 36 payments
  10. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,003 6 payments
  11. Other $5,418 230 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $53,045 48 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $19,168 614 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,478 14 payments
  4. Gift $15 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM sacroiliac joint dysfunction $46,021 44 payments
  2. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM sacroiliac joint dysfunction $7,250 8 payments
  3. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $2,070 33 payments
  4. SPRINT PNS System $1,901 83 payments
  5. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System $1,534 7 payments
  6. INTELLIS $1,132 43 payments
  7. mild Device Kit $1,003 6 payments
  8. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $784 22 payments
  9. Senza $735 10 payments
  10. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $685 20 payments
  11. Other $11,628 435 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic USA, Inc. $410 1 payment
  2. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $55 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

875

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$90,649

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

41%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 44 $34,597
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 27 $23,891
Buprenorphine Generic 50 $14,844
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 13 $4,299
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 183 $3,428
Pregabalin Generic 68 $1,863
Lidocaine Generic 23 $1,592
Gabapentin Generic 65 $1,231
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 52 $807
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 22 $569

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$69,708

Of which drugs: $2,283

Medicare patients

187

Average age 71

Services billed

1,308

120 women, 67 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Depression 35%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
COPD 21%
Heart failure 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 11 36 $2,089
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 35 273 $192

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
$167 44 —
NURTEC ODT
$67 — —
ZAVZPRET
$67 — —
Nucynta
$19 27 —
UBRELVY
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

679 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Wisconsin

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record