Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Atef Israel

Pain Medicine Independence, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1700867587 CMS profile 213549

4911 S Arrowhead Dr, #300, Independence, MO 64055

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,444

263 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$65,096 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, Atef Israel of Independence, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,444 across 263 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $65,096 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $565 28
2024 General $201 8
2023 General $567 23
2022 General $814 43
2021 General $256 15
2020 General $419 25
2019 General $1,624 121

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Atef Israel
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Atef Israel were reported at $565. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Atef Israel Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,624 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $419 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $256 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $814 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $567 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $201 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $565 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nevro Corp. $1,129 51 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $397 29 payments
  3. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $277 17 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $271 16 payments
  5. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $214 13 payments
  6. Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. $164 13 payments
  7. Protega Pharmaceutials LLC $159 11 payments
  8. Globus Medical, Inc. $153 4 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $143 6 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $138 18 payments
  11. Other $1,400 85 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,444 263 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $485 23 payments
  2. Senza $356 10 payments
  3. Omnia $288 18 payments
  4. RELISTOR $280 20 payments
  5. XTAMPZA $200 12 payments
  6. ROXYBOND $159 11 payments
  7. BUNAVAIL 4.2 mg single pouch $158 12 payments
  8. BUNAVAIL 6.3 mg 30-count box $158 12 payments
  9. BUNAVAIL 2.1 mg single pouch $158 12 payments
  10. BUNAVAIL 4.2 mg 30-count box $158 12 payments
  11. Other $3,062 200 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

4,826

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$185,073

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

37.3%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 25 $34,374
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,090 $25,570
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 22 $22,722
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 501 $14,377
Fentanyl Generic 110 $12,928
Ztlido Lidocaine Brand 14 $11,131
Pregabalin Generic 419 $8,821
Gabapentin Generic 618 $7,879
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 16 $7,085
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 331 $6,189

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$88,175

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

419

Average age 73

Services billed

1,064

275 women, 144 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 38%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
COPD 23%
Heart failure 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RELISTOR
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

263 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record