Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashlynne Clark

Dermatology Cedar Rapids, IA Medical Doctor

NPI 1932410867 CMS profile 1373798

202 10Th St Se Ste 270, C/O Pci Medical Pavillion, Cedar Rapids, IA 52403

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$120

4 records reported · program years 2019–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$1,455,915

7 holdings reported · through program year 2023

Research they led as principal investigator

$208 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2023, Ashlynne Clark of Cedar Rapids, IA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $120 across 4 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $208 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $1,455,915 across 7 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 10th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $15 1
2020 General $13 1
2019 General $92 2
2025 Ownership $109,356 1
2024 Ownership $109,356 1
2023 Ownership $106,913 1
2022 Ownership $154,321 1
2021 Ownership $88,340 1
2020 Ownership $80,643 1
2019 Ownership $806,985 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashlynne Clark
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashlynne Clark were reported at $0. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Ashlynne Clark Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $92 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $13 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $0 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $0 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $15 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $0 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $77 1 payment
  2. Pfizer Inc. $15 1 payment
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $15 1 payment
  4. Allergan Inc. $13 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Education $92 2 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $27 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. TREMFYA $77 1 payment
  2. CIBINQO $15 1 payment
  3. SKYRIZI $15 1 payment
  4. BOTOX COSMETIC $13 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

238

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$3,209

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

5.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Fluorouracil Generic 20 $1,881
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 45 $615
Cephalexin Generic 114 $367
Mupirocin Generic 34 $190
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 13 $135
Amoxicillin Generic 12 $21

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$518,109

Of which drugs: $1,872

Medicare patients

481

Average age 76

Services billed

1,867

253 women, 228 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Cancer 17%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 17 $13

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

4 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Iowa

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record