Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashley Miller

Physician Assistant Gainesville, FL Physician Assistant

NPI 1154830321 CMS profile 3817410

114 Nw 76Th Dr, Gainesville, FL 32607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$328,120

1,102 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ashley Miller of Gainesville, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $328,120 across 1,102 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $178,140 374
2024 General $121,987 306
2023 General $23,063 198
2022 General $2,673 118
2021 General $2,252 105
2019 General $6 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashley Miller
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashley Miller were reported at $178,140. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Ashley Miller Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $6 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,252 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,673 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $23,063 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $121,987 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $178,140 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $182,875 324 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $60,969 102 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $41,994 77 payments
  4. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $21,790 73 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $4,601 130 payments
  6. Organon LLC $4,024 15 payments
  7. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,844 59 payments
  8. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $2,081 54 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $1,417 33 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,314 64 payments
  11. Other $4,211 171 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $230,422 124 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $60,825 144 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $27,246 813 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $8,457 8 payments
  5. Education $866 11 payments
  6. Honoraria $305 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $183,481 297 payments
  2. Otezla $50,232 88 payments
  3. Bimzelx $41,758 72 payments
  4. NEMLUVIO $10,138 24 payments
  5. VTAMA $6,052 63 payments
  6. AKLIEF $3,324 3 payments
  7. BOTOX $2,316 15 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,913 38 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $1,518 14 payments
  10. RINVOQ $1,278 48 payments
  11. Other $8,285 503 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

2,155

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$1,148,259

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

9.2%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 33 $669,815
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 62 $236,016
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 11 $102,304
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $94,390
Fluocinonide Generic 164 $7,397
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 167 $6,235
Tacrolimus Generic 34 $4,516
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 269 $3,901
Ketoconazole Generic 223 $3,748
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 177 $3,344

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$305,178

Of which drugs: $16,185

Medicare patients

1,166

Average age 73

Services billed

7,370

689 women, 477 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 47%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Cancer 17%
Depression 17%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 61 358 $271

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$96,426 — —
Otezla
$12,641 — —
VTAMA
$5,838 — —
DUPIXENT
$507 62 —
RINVOQ
$368 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

1,102 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record