Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashley Brown

Dermatology Louisville, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1376962860 CMS profile 5470235

3810 Springhurst Blvd Ste 200, Louisville, KY 40241

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,244

950 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ashley Brown of Louisville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,244 across 950 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,843 200
2024 General $2,453 140
2023 General $2,652 153
2022 General $2,590 157
2021 General $2,045 121
2020 General $941 58
2019 General $1,720 121

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashley Brown
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashley Brown were reported at $3,843. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Ashley Brown Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,720 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $941 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $2,045 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,590 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $2,652 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,453 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,843 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,301 232 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,391 71 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,309 63 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,247 51 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $1,123 69 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,098 90 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,049 72 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $935 71 payments
  9. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $672 32 payments
  10. LEO Pharma Inc. $496 30 payments
  11. Other $3,622 169 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,577 941 payments
  2. Education $667 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $1,776 120 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,450 84 payments
  3. TALTZ $1,066 88 payments
  4. TREMFYA $926 34 payments
  5. Bimzelx $887 43 payments
  6. RINVOQ $870 59 payments
  7. HUMIRA $807 59 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $660 35 payments
  9. Otezla $616 35 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $575 15 payments
  11. Other $10,009 621 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,248

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$203,889

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 30 $119,829
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $57,433
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 211 $8,551
Pimecrolimus Generic 19 $3,581
Ketoconazole Generic 172 $2,511
Tretinoin Generic 33 $1,855
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 93 $1,610
Metronidazole Generic 28 $1,402
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 46 $1,380
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 141 $826

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$112,232

Of which drugs: $9,027

Medicare patients

755

Average age 74

Services billed

9,519

444 women, 311 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 23%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Osteoporosis 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 21 6,800 $8,943
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 23 113 $84

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$396 30 —
Bimzelx
$371 — —
SKYRIZI
$337 — —
Otezla
$214 12 —
COSENTYX
$166 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

950 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Kentucky

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record