Medical Doctor Program year 2023 Reported 2021–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashley Bateman

Adolescent Medicine Malibu, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1275769887 CMS profile 428977

23815 Stuart Ranch Rd Ste 300, Malibu, CA 90265

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$157

4 records reported · program years 2021–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Ashley Bateman of Malibu, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $157 across 4 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $39 2
2021 General $118 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashley Bateman
  • Adolescent Medicine median
  • Middle half of Adolescent Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashley Bateman were reported at $0. Among 40 Adolescent Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $135 and the middle half received between $78 and $573.

Show as a table
Year Ashley Bateman Adolescent Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $112 $24–$444 $163
2020 $0 $80 $35–$250 $114
2021 $118 $229 $55–$448 $132
2022 $0 $162 $35–$492 $149
2023 $39 $182 $54–$507 $160
2024 $0 $142 $59–$362 $164
2025 $0 $135 $78–$573 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. RedHill Biopharma Inc. $100 1 payment
  2. Cranial Technologies, Inc $39 2 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $18 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $157 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Talicia $100 1 payment
  2. Doc Band $39 2 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $18 1 payment
  4. TRULICITY $18 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 77 drugs

Part D claims

2,598

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$91,601

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 44 $35,852
Celebrex Celecoxib Brand 12 $6,764
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 14 $6,691
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 119 $2,760
Estradiol Generic 36 $2,060
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 126 $1,937
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 187 $1,831
Bupropion Xl Bupropion Hcl Brand 64 $1,658
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 26 $1,416
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 47 $1,365

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 77 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 83 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$114,979

Of which drugs: $36,155

Medicare patients

265

Average age 74

Services billed

3,636

191 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 54%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Depression 22%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 1,140 $23,212
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 42 42 $6,247
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 47 48 $3,878
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 18 32 $29

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

4 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Adolescent Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record