Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashley Amedee

Nurse Practitioner Baton Rouge, LA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1962719690 CMS profile 10753905

7777 Hennessy Blvd Ste 7000, Baton Rouge, LA 70808

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,351

508 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ashley Amedee of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,351 across 508 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,635 44
2024 General $2,216 132
2023 General $1,778 106
2022 General $2,133 135
2021 General $1,590 91

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashley Amedee
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashley Amedee were reported at $1,635. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Ashley Amedee Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,590 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,133 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,778 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $2,216 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,635 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $905 56 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $808 54 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $702 42 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $661 44 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $620 34 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $555 31 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $420 31 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $407 21 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $341 22 payments
  10. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $326 20 payments
  11. Other $3,607 153 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,337 507 payments
  2. Education $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $623 39 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $544 39 payments
  3. Ozempic $529 38 payments
  4. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $478 28 payments
  5. FreeStyle Libre 3 $440 24 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $425 23 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $388 20 payments
  8. SHINGRIX $331 20 payments
  9. GEMTESA $326 20 payments
  10. MYRBETRIQ $280 15 payments
  11. Other $9,189 470 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 86 drugs

Part D claims

4,426

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$434,313

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 106 $120,509
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 56 $70,965
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 47 $52,043
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 23 $40,956
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 19 $26,382
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 18 $25,326
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 11 $15,162
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 15 $13,753
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 19 $13,443
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 13 $8,480

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 86 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$35,823

Of which drugs: $2,078

Medicare patients

206

Average age 74

Services billed

672

135 women, 71 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Depression 27%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 21%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 20 20 $1,617

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $234
$234 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $90
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $79
$169 106 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $120
$120 13 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $110
$110 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $104
$104 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

508 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record