Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashish Trivedi

Auburn, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1134177413 CMS profile 323197

121 N Division St, Suite 340, Auburn, WA 98001

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$116,890

1,441 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$34,000

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$23,263 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Ashish Trivedi of Auburn, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $116,890 across 1,441 general payments and $34,000 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $23,263 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,680 159
2024 General $4,079 172
2023 General $13,889 214
2022 General $10,729 181
2021 General $13,191 215
2020 General $35,686 174
2020 Research $14,000 2
2019 General $35,635 326
2019 Research $20,000 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashish Trivedi
  • Washington median
  • Middle half of Washington
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashish Trivedi were reported at $3,680. Among 15,799 Washington profiles paid that year, the median was $133 and the middle half received between $42 and $442.

Show as a table
Year Ashish Trivedi Washington median Middle half National median
2019 $35,635 $126 $38–$506 $163
2020 $35,686 $90 $30–$291 $114
2021 $13,191 $107 $29–$344 $132
2022 $10,729 $124 $38–$398 $149
2023 $13,889 $129 $40–$423 $160
2024 $4,079 $133 $44–$454 $164
2025 $3,680 $133 $42–$442 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $38,470 191 payments
  2. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $17,321 87 payments
  3. EMD Serono, Inc. $12,958 177 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $12,506 64 payments
  5. SK Life Science, Inc. $6,271 25 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $5,501 10 payments
  7. Neurelis, Inc. $4,101 26 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $2,361 52 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $1,501 83 payments
  10. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $1,421 19 payments
  11. Other $14,479 707 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $43,581 18 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $38,386 54 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $23,864 1,299 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $10,463 55 payments
  5. Education $596 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EMGALITY $19,657 104 payments
  2. ONGENTYS $10,267 29 payments
  3. ZEPOSIA $9,326 52 payments
  4. Mavenclad $8,796 31 payments
  5. XCOPRI $6,003 11 payments
  6. REYVOW $4,812 39 payments
  7. INGREZZA $4,648 55 payments
  8. VALTOCO $4,101 26 payments
  9. Ozanimod $2,206 10 payments
  10. NOURIANZ $1,421 19 payments
  11. Other $20,046 1,017 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $34,000 6 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 60 drugs

Part D claims

2,895

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$718,185

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

29.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 23 $205,374
Plegridy Pen Peginterferon Beta-1a Brand 11 $88,996
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 76 $66,657
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 62 $55,415
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 34 $50,467
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 21 $32,021
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 26 $31,511
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 18 $25,874
Ongentys Opicapone Brand 12 $22,379
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 14 $19,030

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 60 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$254,897

Of which drugs: $31,777

Medicare patients

564

Average age 75

Services billed

8,891

309 women, 255 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Depression 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Alzheimer's or dementia 20%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 13 4,452 $22,049

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Leqembi
$192 — —
UBRELVY
$151 — —
REXULTI
$137 12 —
QULIPTA
$124 — —
AMYVID
$116 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

1,447 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record