Who Paid My Doc
Arvind Kumar
Allergy Roseville, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1255315206 CMS profile 102346
1001 Riverside Ave, Ste 230, Roseville, CA 95678
General payments
$59
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Arvind Kumar of Roseville, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $59 across 4 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 8th percentile of Allergy profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $17 | 1 | |
| 2023 | General | $29 | 2 | |
| 2020 | General | $13 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Arvind Kumar
- Allergy median
- Middle half of Allergy
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Arvind Kumar were reported at $17. Among 526 Allergy profiles paid that year, the median was $1,143 and the middle half received between $226 and $2,504.
Show as a table
| Year | Arvind Kumar | Allergy median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $506 | $151–$1,337 | $163 |
| 2020 | $13 | $409 | $108–$1,162 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $549 | $125–$1,485 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $666 | $161–$1,594 | $149 |
| 2023 | $29 | $780 | $186–$1,916 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $1,031 | $271–$2,196 | $164 |
| 2025 | $17 | $1,143 | $226–$2,504 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 9 drugsPart D claims
519
Drug cost
$94,853
Branded share of claims
38%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide | Brand | 49 | $39,309 | |
| Breyna Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate | Brand | 73 | $24,960 | |
| Wixela Inhub Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol | Brand | 34 | $10,940 | |
| Alvesco Ciclesonide | Brand | 41 | $7,326 | |
| Epinephrine | Generic | 31 | $3,790 | |
| Fluticasone Propionate | Generic | 85 | $3,551 | |
| Azelastine Hcl | Generic | 119 | $3,401 | |
| Ipratropium Bromide | Generic | 25 | $891 | |
| Montelukast Sodium | Generic | 62 | $687 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
4 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Allergy in California
Related records
Allergy in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Allergy
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.