Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arturo Blanco

Family Medicine Clinton, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1184778508 CMS profile 8957

728 Clinton Pkwy Ste B, Clinton, MS 39056

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,972

549 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Arturo Blanco of Clinton, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,972 across 549 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $892 47
2024 General $916 52
2023 General $1,652 107
2022 General $1,190 76
2021 General $1,336 86
2020 General $1,515 89
2019 General $1,471 92

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arturo Blanco
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arturo Blanco were reported at $892. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Arturo Blanco Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,471 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,515 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,336 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,190 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,652 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $916 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $892 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,215 65 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,206 70 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,044 71 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $954 58 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $632 38 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $463 35 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $446 24 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $380 22 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $347 23 payments
  10. Exact Sciences Corporation $314 19 payments
  11. Other $1,972 124 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,972 549 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,065 62 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,044 58 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $600 40 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $555 30 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $465 29 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $427 25 payments
  7. Repatha $317 17 payments
  8. AIMOVIG $317 16 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $315 21 payments
  10. XARELTO $277 16 payments
  11. Other $7,305 486 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 173 drugs

Part D claims

15,224

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,576,324

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

22.7%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 164 $213,884
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 145 $209,595
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 194 $206,319
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 148 $175,946
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 97 $109,555
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 112 $107,557
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $45,015
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 24 $34,028
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 41 $30,642
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 20 $29,692

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 173 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$127,589

Of which drugs: $11,118

Medicare patients

380

Average age 75

Services billed

8,387

227 women, 153 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 16%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 95 95 $7,715
Injection, lincomycin hcl, up to 300 mg J2010 Office 19 60 $405
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 51 275 $237
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 14 1,002 $98
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 50 270 $81
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 25 144 $71
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 59 260 $18

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $198
$198 37 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $134
$134 148 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $56
$56 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $51
$51 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $24
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15
$39 164 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

549 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record