Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arthur Skalski

Internal Medicine Enfield, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1013012822 CMS profile 317925

151 Hazard Ave, Suite 10, Enfield, CT 06082

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$9,223

545 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Arthur Skalski of Enfield, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $9,223 across 545 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $624 30
2024 General $1,482 73
2023 General $1,650 86
2022 General $1,164 69
2021 General $1,982 128
2020 General $1,272 87
2019 General $1,049 72

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arthur Skalski
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arthur Skalski were reported at $624. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Arthur Skalski Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,049 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,272 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,982 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,164 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,650 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,482 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $624 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,379 92 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $981 60 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $978 57 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $918 62 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $606 30 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $513 27 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $363 20 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $290 17 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $251 17 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $230 13 payments
  11. Other $2,716 150 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,220 544 payments
  2. Education $3 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $817 53 payments
  2. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $734 49 payments
  3. Ozempic $702 41 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $662 38 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $571 28 payments
  6. BREZTRI $422 22 payments
  7. XARELTO $363 20 payments
  8. CHANTIX $297 21 payments
  9. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $290 17 payments
  10. UBRELVY $281 23 payments
  11. Other $7,567 437 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 162 drugs

Part D claims

17,904

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,557,008

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 249 $299,997
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 170 $200,910
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 204 $194,943
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 85 $130,559
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 130 $127,820
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 65 $65,883
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 32 $43,300
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $41,527
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 57 $41,416
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 13 $38,432

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 162 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 29 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$200,457

Of which drugs: $7,954

Medicare patients

425

Average age 76

Services billed

4,237

226 women, 199 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Depression 18%
Heart failure 14%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 198 198 $7,114

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $213
$213 13 —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $63
  • PFIZER INC. $43
$105 204 —
Xhance
  • OptiNose US, Inc. $83
$83 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $81
$81 130 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $80
$80 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

545 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record