Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arthur Siachos

Cardiovascular Disease Greenville, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1598757171 CMS profile 345213

2 Innovation Dr, Suite 400, Greenville, SC 29607

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,875

557 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$19,974 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Arthur Siachos of Greenville, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,875 across 557 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $19,974 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $888 38
2024 General $548 34
2023 General $916 57
2022 General $1,594 83
2021 General $1,229 80
2020 General $1,051 77
2019 General $2,649 188

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arthur Siachos
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arthur Siachos were reported at $888. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Arthur Siachos Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $2,649 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $1,051 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,229 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $1,594 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $916 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $548 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $888 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,238 138 payments
  2. Abiomed $904 26 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $874 50 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $851 67 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $626 25 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $586 38 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $411 26 payments
  8. Boston Scientific Corporation $399 23 payments
  9. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $396 34 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $314 23 payments
  11. Other $2,275 107 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,713 554 payments
  2. Entertainment $163 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $1,238 138 payments
  2. Repatha $874 50 payments
  3. Impella $824 23 payments
  4. LifeVest $396 34 payments
  5. ENTRESTO $338 25 payments
  6. Corlanor $313 18 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $240 20 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $224 12 payments
  9. BRILINTA $206 15 payments
  10. SYMPLICITY G3 $201 8 payments
  11. Other $4,184 228 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 75 drugs

Part D claims

11,024

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,879,966

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

27.6%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 861 $891,667
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 204 $254,546
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 232 $193,510
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 145 $136,856
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 125 $103,693
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 45 $61,052
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 41 $30,404
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 36 $25,747
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 31 $24,748
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 1,266 $15,202

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 75 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 87 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$427,726

Of which drugs: $4,097

Medicare patients

2,754

Average age 77

Services billed

8,916

1,392 women, 1,362 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 57%
Arthritis 52%
Atrial fibrillation 40%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Diabetes 34%
Heart failure 33%
Depression 29%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, perflutren lipid microspheres, per ml Q9957 Office 39 78 $2,470
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 71 284 $1,627

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $67
$67 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

557 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record