Doctor of Optometry Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arthur Jung

Optometrist New York, NY Doctor of Optometry

NPI 1730281577 CMS profile 1152883

22 W 13Th St, New York, NY 10011

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,866

327 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Arthur Jung of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,866 across 327 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Optometrist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,546 47
2024 General $11,131 57
2023 General $17,379 77
2022 General $15,049 85
2021 General $3,902 32
2020 General $76 4
2019 General $783 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arthur Jung
  • Optometrist median
  • Middle half of Optometrist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arthur Jung were reported at $1,546. Among 35,373 Optometrist profiles paid that year, the median was $204 and the middle half received between $87 and $464.

Show as a table
Year Arthur Jung Optometrist median Middle half National median
2019 $783 $159 $67–$371 $163
2020 $76 $72 $29–$165 $114
2021 $3,902 $125 $46–$292 $132
2022 $15,049 $162 $66–$374 $149
2023 $17,379 $177 $72–$406 $160
2024 $11,131 $188 $77–$427 $164
2025 $1,546 $204 $87–$464 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. $43,035 121 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $1,352 31 payments
  3. Topcon Medical Systems, Inc. $1,000 1 payment
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $892 37 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $603 25 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $488 21 payments
  7. Harrow Eye, LLC $450 9 payments
  8. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $342 19 payments
  9. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $287 14 payments
  10. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $220 5 payments
  11. Other $1,197 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $20,978 26 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $13,990 12 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $8,755 263 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $6,054 23 payments
  5. Entertainment $65 1 payment
  6. Education $25 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Acuvue $42,484 108 payments
  2. MIEBO $965 12 payments
  3. Cequa $920 38 payments
  4. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $664 10 payments
  5. VEVYE $450 9 payments
  6. VYZULTA $426 17 payments
  7. LUMIGAN $382 18 payments
  8. XIIDRA Ophthalmology $348 4 payments
  9. Xelpros $311 14 payments
  10. XDEMVY $287 14 payments
  11. Other $3,544 137 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

396

Median for Optometry: 120

Drug cost

$174,259

Median for Optometry: $8,864

Branded share of claims

51.3%

Median for Optometry: 24.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 90 $108,888
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 45 $32,779
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 14 $12,750
Cyclosporine Generic 20 $10,764
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 14 $3,746
Bimatoprost Generic 15 $1,977
Latanoprost Generic 104 $982
Timolol Maleate Generic 29 $778
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 38 $682
Tobramycin-Dexamethasone Tobramycin/Dexamethasone Brand 16 $570

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 27,653 Part D prescribers listed as Optometry; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$88,553

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

452

Average age 75

Services billed

2,054

270 women, 182 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 55%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 23%
Diabetes 20%
Cancer 19%
Depression 13%
Atrial fibrillation 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $261
$261 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $246
$246 14 —
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $163
$163 45 —
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $83
$83 — —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $70
$70 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

327 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record