Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arpit Rao

Hematology & Oncology Minneapolis, MN Medical Doctor

NPI 1982991170 CMS profile 1381873

909 Fulton St Se, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$46,118

65 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$14,633

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,537,953 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Arpit Rao of Minneapolis, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $46,118 across 65 general payments and $14,633 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,537,953 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $77 1
2024 General $140 1
2023 General $18,165 18
2022 General $5,987 12
2021 General $13,055 9
2020 General $4,574 4
2019 General $4,119 20
2019 Research $14,633 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arpit Rao
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arpit Rao were reported at $77. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Arpit Rao Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,119 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $4,574 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $13,055 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $5,987 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $18,165 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $140 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $77 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $18,168 18 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $6,075 5 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $5,020 19 payments
  4. Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC $4,507 3 payments
  5. Janssen Global Services, LLC $2,700 1 payment
  6. Genzyme Corporation $2,353 3 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $2,284 1 payment
  8. Eisai Inc. $2,280 1 payment
  9. Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,100 1 payment
  10. Inari Medical, Inc. $140 1 payment
  11. Other $489 12 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $23,406 13 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12,185 3 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $6,318 20 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $2,108 28 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TALZENNA $17,933 16 payments
  2. XTANDI $5,641 10 payments
  3. OPDIVO $4,875 2 payments
  4. PROVENGE $4,507 3 payments
  5. ERLEADA $2,838 5 payments
  6. JEVTANA $2,328 2 payments
  7. Nubeqa $2,284 1 payment
  8. Lenvima $2,280 1 payment
  9. FOTIVDA $2,100 1 payment
  10. VERZENIO $548 14 payments
  11. Other $668 11 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $14,633 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

11

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$43

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisone Generic 11 $43

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

67 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record