Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Arnaldo Da Silva

Neurology West Palm Beach, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1801004841 CMS profile 308835

4631 North Congress Ave, Suite 200, West Palm Beach, FL 33407

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$138,086

895 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Arnaldo Da Silva of West Palm Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $138,086 across 895 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $18,474 106
2024 General $2,924 117
2023 General $1,780 105
2022 General $5,674 159
2021 General $10,161 111
2020 General $32,870 91
2019 General $66,204 206

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Arnaldo Da Silva
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Arnaldo Da Silva were reported at $18,474. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Arnaldo Da Silva Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $66,204 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $32,870 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $10,161 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $5,674 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $1,780 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $2,924 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $18,474 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $39,704 118 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $25,670 112 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $21,365 69 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $15,431 41 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $9,165 114 payments
  6. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $7,063 13 payments
  7. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,006 11 payments
  8. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $3,651 16 payments
  9. Lundbeck LLC $2,560 35 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $2,312 34 payments
  11. Other $7,161 332 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $89,253 53 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $18,490 7 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $15,775 790 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $8,378 40 payments
  5. Honoraria $6,038 3 payments
  6. Education $153 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AIMOVIG $21,470 79 payments
  2. EMGALITY $20,907 58 payments
  3. AJOVY Central Nervous System $13,184 71 payments
  4. Ajovy Central Nervous System $12,396 35 payments
  5. UBRELVY $10,895 27 payments
  6. QULIPTA $8,790 82 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $7,657 27 payments
  8. Symbravo $7,063 13 payments
  9. BOTOX $4,502 10 payments
  10. REYVOW $3,046 6 payments
  11. Other $14,075 520 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 31 drugs

Part D claims

1,779

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,008,837

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

64.1%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 207 $239,902
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 191 $155,258
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 111 $151,541
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 160 $138,580
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 77 $134,047
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 58 $79,786
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 73 $58,612
Elyxyb Celecoxib Brand 11 $10,064
Ajovy Syringe Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 12 $9,890
Naratriptan Hcl Generic 81 $6,578

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 31 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$477,442

Of which drugs: $350,358

Medicare patients

274

Average age 72

Services billed

71,793

212 women, 62 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 66%
Osteoporosis 35%
Depression 34%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 126 70,900 $350,359

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Apokyn
$742 — —
ZTLido
$276 — —
Briviact
$249 — —
NURTEC ODT
$199 77 —
ZAVZPRET
$199 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

895 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record