Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Archana Shah

Infectious Disease Winter Park, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1124096391 CMS profile 187545

185 N Lakemont Ave Ste B, Winter Park, FL 32792

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,096

820 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Archana Shah of Winter Park, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,096 across 820 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,104 112
2024 General $1,509 83
2023 General $1,808 110
2022 General $2,575 132
2021 General $1,803 111
2020 General $1,452 105
2019 General $2,845 167

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Archana Shah
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Archana Shah were reported at $2,104. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Archana Shah Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $2,845 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $1,452 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $1,803 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $2,575 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $1,808 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $1,509 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $2,104 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $3,264 230 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,778 124 payments
  3. Insmed, Inc. $1,427 72 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,210 67 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $997 75 payments
  6. La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company $934 36 payments
  7. Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. $913 51 payments
  8. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $759 45 payments
  9. Shionogi Inc $452 21 payments
  10. Janssen Products, LP $325 4 payments
  11. Other $2,038 95 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,420 794 payments
  2. Education $664 25 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DOVATO $2,126 167 payments
  2. Arikayce $1,383 68 payments
  3. SYMTUZA $1,154 67 payments
  4. DIFICID $964 54 payments
  5. NUZYRA $759 45 payments
  6. PIFELTRO $625 35 payments
  7. DELSTRIGO $584 33 payments
  8. Orbactiv $464 25 payments
  9. Vabomere $455 30 payments
  10. ZERBAXA $452 23 payments
  11. Other $7,069 361 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

2,071

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$2,341,034

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

40.2%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Arikayce Amikacin Liposomal/Neb.Accessr Brand 51 $766,775
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 71 $273,300
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 89 $260,634
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 56 $253,748
Cabenuva Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 36 $233,468
Rukobia Fostemsavir Tromethamine Brand 23 $211,091
Nuzyra Omadacycline Tosylate Brand 13 $83,257
Gamunex-C Immune Globul G/Gly/Iga Avg 46 Brand 11 $59,293
Daptomycin Generic 56 $52,579
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 12 $26,547

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$816,300

Of which drugs: $81,290

Medicare patients

1,741

Average age 78

Services billed

19,112

977 women, 764 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 60%
Ischemic heart disease 55%
Chronic kidney disease 55%
Diabetes 50%
Heart failure 49%
Depression 45%
Atrial fibrillation 43%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
$312 89 —
Fetroja
$192 — —
CABENUVA
$130 36 —
XERAVA
$123 — —
Arikayce
$106 51 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

820 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Infectious Disease in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record