Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

April Erwin

Neurology Salt Lake City, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1194976670 CMS profile 8645

370 E 9Th Ave Ste 106, Salt Lake City, UT 84103

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$263,473

1,531 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,674,083 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, April Erwin of Salt Lake City, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $263,473 across 1,531 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,674,083 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $33,138 214
2024 General $41,748 268
2023 General $49,898 221
2022 General $10,463 289
2021 General $6,342 187
2020 General $18,361 128
2019 General $103,522 224

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • April Erwin
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to April Erwin were reported at $33,138. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year April Erwin Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $103,522 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $18,361 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $6,342 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $10,463 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $49,898 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $41,748 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $33,138 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $49,774 251 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $44,821 136 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $41,365 114 payments
  4. Genzyme Corporation $41,339 55 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $27,339 120 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $27,323 54 payments
  7. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $20,087 84 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $2,263 164 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $775 35 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $698 40 payments
  11. Other $7,690 478 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $142,641 39 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $70,742 34 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $26,156 1,377 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $23,651 74 payments
  5. Education $284 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozanimod $23,810 25 payments
  2. OCREVUS $20,845 42 payments
  3. BRIUMVI $20,087 84 payments
  4. Mavenclad Neurology $19,243 5 payments
  5. ZEPOSIA $17,678 97 payments
  6. MAYZENT $14,788 38 payments
  7. KESIMPTA $14,388 136 payments
  8. TYSABRI $9,063 77 payments
  9. TECFIDERA $8,233 21 payments
  10. Mavenclad Neurology $7,384 20 payments
  11. Other $34,035 1,021 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

1,342

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$383,879

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

18.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 24 $218,968
Glatiramer Acetate Generic 24 $82,025
Dalfampridine Er Dalfampridine Brand 56 $16,282
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 15 $14,353
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 14 $7,534
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 12 $7,124
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 36 $5,759
Baclofen Generic 152 $4,895
Gabapentin Generic 150 $4,200
Teriflunomide Generic 31 $3,527

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,493,205

Of which drugs: $1,455,602

Medicare patients

211

Average age 66

Services billed

77,102

146 women, 65 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 50%
Depression 38%
Arthritis 37%
Osteoporosis 21%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Diabetes 15%
Ischemic heart disease 12%
Cancer 10%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, natalizumab, 1 mg J2323 Office 87 65,436 $1,145,987
Injection, ocrelizumab, 1 mg J2350 Office 19 8,106 $304,062
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 22 1,825 $380

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Mavenclad
$16,200 — —
BRIUMVI
$7,818 — —
KESIMPTA
$542 24 —
UBRELVY
$292 — —
ZEPOSIA
$238 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,531 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record