Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anthony Jones

Family Medicine Oakland, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1538246194 CMS profile 115145

400 29Th St, Ste 501, Oakland, CA 94609

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$376,780

1,500 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Anthony Jones of Oakland, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $376,780 across 1,500 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $59,371 207
2024 General $75,006 237
2023 General $37,090 194
2022 General $36,054 167
2021 General $21,852 186
2020 General $37,360 180
2019 General $110,046 329

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anthony Jones
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anthony Jones were reported at $59,371. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Anthony Jones Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $110,046 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $37,360 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $21,852 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $36,054 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $37,090 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $75,006 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $59,371 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $237,739 539 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $102,546 311 payments
  3. Janssen Products, LP $21,041 24 payments
  4. Theratechnologies Inc. $2,888 53 payments
  5. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,467 129 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,533 74 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,239 16 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,225 59 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,166 63 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $1,026 46 payments
  11. Other $3,911 186 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $253,332 114 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $62,002 138 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $32,301 1,237 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $29,040 8 payments
  5. Education $105 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biktarvy $93,978 108 payments
  2. DOVATO $78,733 150 payments
  3. Descovy $35,607 44 payments
  4. SYMTUZA $21,916 72 payments
  5. Yeztugo $11,588 16 payments
  6. Truvada $9,432 12 payments
  7. CABENUVA $5,670 25 payments
  8. TIVICAY $4,567 10 payments
  9. EGRIFTA $1,320 50 payments
  10. TROGARZO $1,195 45 payments
  11. Other $14,484 733 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 157 drugs

Part D claims

7,611

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$4,088,408

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

31.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 289 $1,135,529
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 93 $487,273
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 143 $337,665
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 72 $207,798
Rukobia Fostemsavir Tromethamine Brand 22 $193,776
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 47 $168,548
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 73 $159,876
Pifeltro Doravirine Brand 76 $135,734
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 36 $129,786
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 79 $112,456

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 157 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$618,572

Of which drugs: $11,472

Medicare patients

269

Average age 71

Services billed

11,534

106 women, 163 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Cancer 16%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 14 15 $4,381
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 25 25 $3,820
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 21 21 $1,718

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DOVATO
$32,780 72 —
Biktarvy
$23,888 289 —
Descovy
$10,712 73 —
RUKOBIA
$345 22 —
EGRIFTA
$234 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,500 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record