Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anthony Afong

Pain Medicine Port St Lucie, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1801864160 CMS profile 353878

150 Sw Chamber Court, Suite 105, Port St Lucie, FL 34986

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,172

494 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Anthony Afong of Port St Lucie, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,172 across 494 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,377 69
2024 General $5,547 82
2023 General $1,126 38
2022 General $3,301 77
2021 General $1,744 70
2020 General $913 41
2019 General $2,164 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anthony Afong
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anthony Afong were reported at $3,377. Among 1,144 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $402 and the middle half received between $130 and $1,173.

Show as a table
Year Anthony Afong Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,164 $409 $115–$1,311 $163
2020 $913 $214 $66–$666 $114
2021 $1,744 $299 $84–$899 $132
2022 $3,301 $335 $103–$1,149 $149
2023 $1,126 $376 $114–$1,228 $160
2024 $5,547 $387 $115–$1,173 $164
2025 $3,377 $402 $130–$1,173 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $2,764 97 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $2,652 42 payments
  3. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $2,211 16 payments
  4. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $1,670 25 payments
  5. MML US, Inc. $1,655 6 payments
  6. Vertos Medical, Inc. $1,229 35 payments
  7. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $885 50 payments
  8. Curonix LLC $668 11 payments
  9. Nevro Corp. $524 34 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $513 21 payments
  11. Other $3,400 157 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,276 472 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $4,275 21 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $621 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Evoke $1,997 14 payments
  2. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $1,670 25 payments
  3. ReActiv8 $1,655 6 payments
  4. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $965 37 payments
  5. SYNCHROMEDII $955 15 payments
  6. OSTEOCOOL RF ABLATION SYSTEM $924 6 payments
  7. mild Device Kit $916 26 payments
  8. XTAMPZA $677 40 payments
  9. PNS FREEDOM-4A PERMANENT NEUROSTIMULATOR RECEIVER KIT CHANNEL A $668 11 payments
  10. Proclaim IPG $448 15 payments
  11. Other $8,519 354 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

3,777

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$226,292

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

64.2%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 118 $54,335
Nucynta Er Tapentadol Hcl Brand 21 $34,643
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,571 $26,301
Buprenorphine Generic 57 $18,327
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 24 $18,320
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Buprenorphine Hcl/Naloxone Hcl Brand 76 $11,414
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 379 $8,345
Pregabalin Generic 262 $8,243
Fentanyl Generic 77 $7,353
Hysingla Er Hydrocodone Bitartrate Brand 13 $7,044

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$176,001

Of which drugs: $29,882

Medicare patients

223

Average age 70

Services billed

10,040

129 women, 94 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Depression 36%
COPD 31%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 14 64 $351
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 15 965 $94

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $102
$102 — —
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $60
$60 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —
Tirosint
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $54
$54 — —
Licart
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $54
$54 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

494 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record