Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anna Tran

Occupational Medicine Glendale, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1962523613 CMS profile 270151

8811 N 51St Ave, Suite 107, Glendale, AZ 85302

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,081

228 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Anna Tran of Glendale, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,081 across 228 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Occupational Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $67 3
2024 General $702 36
2023 General $741 40
2022 General $599 33
2021 General $1,216 74
2020 General $493 25
2019 General $263 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anna Tran
  • Occupational Medicine median
  • Middle half of Occupational Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anna Tran were reported at $67. Among 219 Occupational Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $54 and the middle half received between $24 and $162.

Show as a table
Year Anna Tran Occupational Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $263 $59 $18–$204 $163
2020 $493 $49 $21–$288 $114
2021 $1,216 $56 $22–$204 $132
2022 $599 $83 $24–$209 $149
2023 $741 $71 $25–$185 $160
2024 $702 $77 $26–$205 $164
2025 $67 $54 $24–$162 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $654 42 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $511 27 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $494 27 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $358 22 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $336 22 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $220 12 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $209 11 payments
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $168 8 payments
  9. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $134 7 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $101 6 payments
  11. Other $895 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,081 228 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $308 25 payments
  2. FARXIGA $290 13 payments
  3. Otezla $249 15 payments
  4. Repatha $247 15 payments
  5. BREZTRI $246 9 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $215 8 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $213 15 payments
  8. TRULICITY $191 13 payments
  9. Proclaim IPG $190 13 payments
  10. ZENPEP $170 9 payments
  11. Other $2,832 151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 90 drugs

Part D claims

4,977

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$693,806

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

16.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 86 $108,329
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 67 $86,787
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 59 $70,120
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 11 $70,072
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 44 $50,174
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 47 $46,980
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 26 $34,462
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 33 $33,462
Prolia Denosumab Brand 18 $31,023
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 21 $27,291

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 90 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$29,399

Of which drugs: $1,218

Medicare patients

70

Average age 71

Services billed

542

44 women, 26 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 43%
Arthritis 37%
Osteoporosis 34%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Ischemic heart disease 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 15 30 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $114
$114 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $93
$93 86 —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $75
$75 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $61
  • Lilly USA, LLC $14
$75 67 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $55
$55 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

228 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Occupational Medicine in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record