Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anna Shah

Neurology Aurora, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1487065637 CMS profile 4649270

12605 E 16Th Ave, # Msc272, Aurora, CO 80045

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$156,945

118 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,666

Paid to them · 8 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,206,998 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Anna Shah of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $156,945 across 118 general payments and $5,666 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,206,998 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,027 16
2025 Research $4,528 6
2024 General $23,038 47
2024 Research $1,138 2
2023 General $25,900 34
2022 General $10,710 15
2021 General $2,632 5
2019 General $86,638 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anna Shah
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anna Shah were reported at $8,027. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Anna Shah Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $86,638 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $0 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $2,632 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $10,710 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $25,900 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $23,038 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $8,027 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biogen, Inc. $87,154 9 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $32,750 31 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $12,802 11 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $10,858 15 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $6,912 23 payments
  6. TG Therapeutics, Inc. $4,423 6 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,280 1 payment
  8. Celgene Corporation $394 14 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $233 4 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $44 1 payment
  11. Other $94 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Grant $86,638 1 payment
  2. Consulting Fee $64,189 19 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $4,354 89 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,764 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Evobrutinib $13,170 3 payments
  2. OCREVUS $12,594 9 payments
  3. UPLIZNA $10,858 15 payments
  4. Mavenclad Neurology $8,400 1 payment
  5. KESIMPTA $6,895 22 payments
  6. BRIUMVI $4,423 6 payments
  7. TYSABRI $389 6 payments
  8. ZEPOSIA $371 13 payments
  9. VUMERITY $162 3 payments
  10. MAVENCLAD Neurology $131 3 payments
  11. Other $231 6 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $5,666 8 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

544

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$478,913

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

31.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 26 $214,719
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 16 $197,415
Dalfampridine Er Dalfampridine Brand 64 $41,417
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 13 $11,085
Baclofen Generic 105 $4,145
Modafinil Generic 46 $1,783
Gabapentin Generic 43 $1,497
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 45 $1,457
Pregabalin Generic 14 $1,319
Dextroamphetamine-Amphet Er Dextroamphetamine/Amphetamine Brand 17 $1,022

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 6 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$18,876

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

119

Average age 62

Services billed

172

93 women, 26 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 45%
High blood pressure 44%
Depression 40%
Osteoporosis 26%
Cancer 13%
COPD 9%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Mavenclad
  • EMD Serono, Inc. $8,400
$8,400 — —
KESIMPTA
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $6,677
$6,677 16 —
ZEPOSIA
  • Celgene Corporation $176
$176 — —
OCREVUS
  • Genentech, Inc. $44
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $44
$89 — —
VUMERITY
  • Biogen, Inc. $38
$38 26 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

126 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record