Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anita Palandri

Nurse Practitioner Phoenix, AZ Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1851840870 CMS profile 10660966

2925 W Rose Garden Ln Ste 110, Phoenix, AZ 85027

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,531

846 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Anita Palandri of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,531 across 846 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,021 91
2024 General $4,981 226
2023 General $5,534 199
2022 General $4,510 224
2021 General $2,484 106

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anita Palandri
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anita Palandri were reported at $2,021. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Anita Palandri Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $2,484 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $4,510 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $5,534 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $4,981 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $2,021 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,224 71 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,101 50 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $960 47 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $955 43 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $857 32 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $850 56 payments
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $779 33 payments
  8. CTI BioPharma Corp. $747 3 payments
  9. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $716 28 payments
  10. Exelixis Inc. $702 7 payments
  11. Other $10,640 476 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $17,860 835 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $700 1 payment
  3. Education $551 9 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $420 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $1,062 47 payments
  2. Vonjo $747 3 payments
  3. OPDIVO $630 40 payments
  4. VERZENIO $617 25 payments
  5. CABOMETYX $614 3 payments
  6. XPOVIO $582 9 payments
  7. TUKYSA $501 18 payments
  8. ENHERTU $473 19 payments
  9. LYNPARZA $420 18 payments
  10. IMBRUVICA $415 19 payments
  11. Other $18,281 900 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

1,371

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$2,683,196

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

38.5%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 39 $624,914
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 67 $590,241
Lenalidomide Generic 25 $315,194
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 12 $198,424
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $185,803
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 11 $169,916
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 48 $146,887
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 15 $127,990
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 139 $114,760
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 33 $81,460

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 94 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$451,098

Of which drugs: $428,416

Medicare patients

160

Average age 74

Services billed

25,649

113 women, 47 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 65%
Arthritis 39%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 28%
Depression 27%
Osteoporosis 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, immune globulin, (gammagard liquid), non-lyophilized, (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1569 Office 11 830 $29,720
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 15 190 $137
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 25 450 $40
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 15 20 $20
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 17 24 $15

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 96 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REBLOZYL
$183 — —
KEYTRUDA
$182 — —
VERZENIO
$147 — —
ENHERTU
$134 — —
INJECTAFER
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 96 with Patron

Records

846 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record