Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Angela Conrad

Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics Tulsa, OK Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1346874799 CMS profile 10865106

10901 E 48Th St, Tulsa, OK 74146

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,340

278 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Angela Conrad of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,340 across 278 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,670 69
2024 General $1,899 83
2023 General $1,989 89
2022 General $783 37

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Angela Conrad
  • Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Angela Conrad were reported at $1,670. Among 7,458 Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $93 and the middle half received between $35 and $201.

Show as a table
Year Angela Conrad Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $0 $60 $23–$142 $132
2022 $783 $72 $27–$161 $149
2023 $1,989 $89 $35–$185 $160
2024 $1,899 $93 $34–$199 $164
2025 $1,670 $93 $35–$201 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,512 57 payments
  2. Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC $740 28 payments
  3. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $720 34 payments
  4. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $527 22 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $435 21 payments
  6. Urogen Pharma, Inc. $338 18 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $222 9 payments
  8. Coloplast Corp $218 12 payments
  9. Accord Healthcare, Inc. $198 11 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $136 5 payments
  11. Other $1,294 61 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,250 277 payments
  2. Education $90 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. ERLEADA $1,366 52 payments
  2. PROVENGE $740 28 payments
  3. Nubeqa $527 22 payments
  4. Xofigo $469 19 payments
  5. GEMTESA $462 25 payments
  6. LYNPARZA Oncology $435 21 payments
  7. KEYTRUDA $435 21 payments
  8. ORGOVYX $292 13 payments
  9. JELMYTO $280 15 payments
  10. LYNPARZA Oncology $222 9 payments
  11. Other $2,313 107 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

278 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record