Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andrew Tegeder

Dermatology Missoula, MT Medical Doctor

NPI 1376835769 CMS profile 1349144

2835 Fort Missoula Rd Bldg 3, Missoula, MT 59804

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,295

223 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$364,497 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Andrew Tegeder of Missoula, MT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,295 across 223 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $364,497 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 56th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $440 28
2024 General $502 38
2023 General $333 23
2022 General $364 31
2021 General $529 39
2020 General $325 17
2019 General $801 47

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andrew Tegeder
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andrew Tegeder were reported at $440. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Andrew Tegeder Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $801 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $325 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $529 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $364 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $333 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $502 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $440 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,278 117 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $451 28 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $414 18 payments
  4. PruGen, Inc. Pharmaceuticals $215 4 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $182 9 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $177 11 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $171 9 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $119 9 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $100 5 payments
  10. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $48 4 payments
  11. Other $139 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,096 221 payments
  2. Education $199 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI Immunology $707 64 payments
  2. HUMIRA $352 35 payments
  3. TREMFYA $331 14 payments
  4. COSENTYX $288 16 payments
  5. RINVOQ $238 24 payments
  6. SOTYKTU $177 11 payments
  7. SKYRIZI Immunology $175 12 payments
  8. STELARA $173 12 payments
  9. TALTZ $171 9 payments
  10. DUPIXENT $154 8 payments
  11. Other $818 51 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

761

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$781,308

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

23.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 18 $378,463
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $115,731
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 15 $96,962
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 13 $96,321
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 11 $74,853
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 136 $5,933
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 44 $1,618
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 12 $1,595
Metronidazole Generic 20 $1,484
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 28 $1,480

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$234,212

Of which drugs: $1,066

Medicare patients

1,318

Average age 74

Services billed

6,719

467 women, 851 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 58%
Arthritis 38%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Diabetes 16%
Depression 15%
Cancer 14%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 13 23 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $181
$181 18 —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $140
$140 13 —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $94
$94 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $72
$72 15 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

223 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Montana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record