Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andres Patron

Internal Medicine Pembroke Pines, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1700876877 CMS profile 168518

10796 Pines Blvd, Suite #205, Pembroke Pines, FL 33026

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,303

219 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$737,469

Paid to them · 39 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$279,676 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Andres Patron of Pembroke Pines, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,303 across 219 general payments and $737,469 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $279,676 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $456 20
2024 General $448 17
2023 General $507 26
2022 General $581 26
2021 General $833 41
2021 Research $155,921 17
2020 General $773 41
2020 Research $339,353 14
2019 General $1,704 48
2019 Research $242,196 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andres Patron
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andres Patron were reported at $456. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Andres Patron Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,704 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $773 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $833 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $581 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $507 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $448 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $456 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,225 61 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $974 35 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $744 7 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $501 32 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $272 8 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $226 10 payments
  7. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $210 10 payments
  8. Exact Sciences Corporation $175 7 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $155 8 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $148 7 payments
  11. Other $675 34 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,924 216 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $373 2 payments
  3. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $729 37 payments
  2. FARXIGA $634 22 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $572 28 payments
  4. Tresiba $277 14 payments
  5. TRULICITY $230 17 payments
  6. JARDIANCE $226 10 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $223 13 payments
  8. Vascepa $215 5 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $204 6 payments
  10. Wegovy $186 8 payments
  11. Other $2,217 112 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Sanofi US Services Inc. $737,469 39 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 121 drugs

Part D claims

7,297

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$611,765

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 144 $156,215
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 43 $62,564
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 43 $55,099
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 38 $54,321
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 40 $44,665
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 30 $38,732
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $36,896
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 22 $30,511
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 22 $21,663
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 20 $12,610

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 121 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 22 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$26,653

Of which drugs: $371

Medicare patients

90

Average age 74

Services billed

405

57 women, 33 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 42%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Cancer 22%
Osteoporosis 16%
Depression 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $204
$204 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $71
$71 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $34
$34 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $21
$21 — —
LINZESS
  • AbbVie, Inc. $20
$20 20 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

258 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record