Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anatole Barkan

Internal Medicine Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1326057787 CMS profile 150355

1503 Gravesend Neck Rd, Brooklyn, NY 11229

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,089

785 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Anatole Barkan of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,089 across 785 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,977 93
2024 General $2,013 100
2023 General $1,841 91
2022 General $2,380 109
2021 General $2,480 149
2020 General $1,705 106
2019 General $2,693 137

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anatole Barkan
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anatole Barkan were reported at $1,977. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Anatole Barkan Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,693 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,705 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,480 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,380 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,841 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,013 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,977 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,115 83 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,346 65 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,103 70 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $917 28 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $807 43 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $762 52 payments
  7. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $724 42 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $712 35 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $702 60 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $561 35 payments
  11. Other $5,338 272 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,089 785 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,419 58 payments
  2. GEMTESA $897 54 payments
  3. BREZTRI $659 30 payments
  4. XIFAXAN $609 53 payments
  5. TRULANCE $511 43 payments
  6. EVENITY $501 10 payments
  7. CREON $474 30 payments
  8. Vascepa $467 27 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $454 23 payments
  10. LINZESS $411 26 payments
  11. Other $13,046 689 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 287 drugs

Part D claims

39,120

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,003,488

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

33.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 436 $437,794
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 251 $325,686
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 525 $272,322
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 249 $259,995
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 403 $253,487
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 361 $244,072
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 360 $236,220
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 526 $213,292
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 569 $200,963
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 304 $174,054

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 287 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 37 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$243,025

Of which drugs: $9,365

Medicare patients

583

Average age 75

Services billed

5,451

328 women, 255 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 45%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 25%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Heart failure 16%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 292 293 $6,417
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90686 Office 34 34 $745

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $355
$355 189 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $256
$256 137 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $235
$235 66 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $132
$132 194 —
LINZESS
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc $73
  • AbbVie, Inc. $44
$116 525 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

785 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record