Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amy Rains

Nurse Practitioner, Family Chattanooga, TN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1801206859 CMS profile 10948652

979 E 3Rd St Ste C830, Chattanooga, TN 37403

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$55,281

989 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Amy Rains of Chattanooga, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $55,281 across 989 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,499 130
2024 General $10,009 188
2023 General $14,487 222
2022 General $17,865 230
2021 General $6,421 219

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amy Rains
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amy Rains were reported at $6,499. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Amy Rains Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $6,421 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $17,865 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $14,487 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $10,009 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $6,499 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $41,794 351 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $3,775 209 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,951 10 payments
  4. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $1,393 52 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $930 71 payments
  6. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $756 41 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $677 48 payments
  8. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $597 29 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $423 21 payments
  10. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $310 10 payments
  11. Other $2,676 147 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $36,306 32 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $15,591 924 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,417 27 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $775 2 payments
  5. Education $191 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $33,751 198 payments
  2. QULIPTA $17,405 135 payments
  3. Vercise $1,900 8 payments
  4. Austedo XR $1,822 97 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $1,686 112 payments
  6. DUOPA $1,227 25 payments
  7. AUSTEDO $977 56 payments
  8. NUPLAZID $967 37 payments
  9. AJOVY $794 54 payments
  10. BOTOX $785 45 payments
  11. Other $6,147 336 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 59 drugs

Part D claims

2,553

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,191,948

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

42.3%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 87 $440,697
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 94 $189,953
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 80 $143,858
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 95 $120,926
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 16 $97,196
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 30 $39,425
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 44 $30,613
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 19 $17,587
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 309 $16,393
Neupro Rotigotine Brand 17 $14,927

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 59 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$65,947

Of which drugs: $40,733

Medicare patients

160

Average age 73

Services billed

8,929

99 women, 61 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 57%
Depression 45%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Heart failure 18%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 17 8,555 $40,726

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $3,502
$3,502 80 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $1,881
$1,881 95 —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $650
$650 16 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $319
$319 — 8,555
NUPLAZID
  • ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $210
$210 87 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

989 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record