Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amy Daliman

Cardiovascular Disease Mesa, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1326333733 CMS profile 151415

6309 E Baywood Ave Ste 101, Mesa, AZ 85206

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$66,604

191 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Amy Daliman of Mesa, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $66,604 across 191 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $492 19
2024 General $31,439 44
2023 General $27,137 38
2022 General $4,099 46
2021 General $1,276 17
2020 General $151 9
2019 General $2,010 18

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amy Daliman
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amy Daliman were reported at $492. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Amy Daliman Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $2,010 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $151 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,276 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $4,099 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $27,137 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $31,439 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $492 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abiomed $59,811 57 payments
  2. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $1,634 12 payments
  3. Penumbra, Inc. $1,450 3 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $622 26 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $502 9 payments
  6. HeartFlow, Inc. $350 6 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $344 15 payments
  8. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $278 2 payments
  9. Cleerly, Inc. $163 4 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $160 11 payments
  11. Other $1,290 46 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Honoraria $49,550 8 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $8,746 21 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $6,819 159 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,450 2 payments
  5. Long term medical supply or device loan $39 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Impella $59,795 56 payments
  2. Edwards SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve $1,394 7 payments
  3. Indigo System $1,344 2 payments
  4. FFRct $350 6 payments
  5. Spectranetics Undiv $250 1 payment
  6. Resolute $216 2 payments
  7. Cleerly Labs $163 4 payments
  8. Cleerly Ischemia $163 4 payments
  9. CoreValve Evolut $154 1 payment
  10. SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA $146 2 payments
  11. Other $2,823 108 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

4,846

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$778,341

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

27.1%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 389 $499,118
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 74 $103,330
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 57 $82,511
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 28 $28,992
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 489 $6,325
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 511 $6,179
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 49 $4,909
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 452 $4,769
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 355 $4,431
Valsartan Generic 136 $3,303

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 85 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$987,203

Of which drugs: $4,962

Medicare patients

1,037

Average age 76

Services billed

6,672

587 women, 450 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Arthritis 52%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Diabetes 31%
Atrial fibrillation 31%
Heart failure 28%
COPD 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 230 984 $4,962

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $38
$38 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $32
$32 389 —
Arcalyst
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, plc $22
$22 — —
VYNDAQEL
  • PFIZER INC. $19
$19 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $13
$13 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

191 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record