Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amol Soin

Interventional Pain Medicine Dayton, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1316135585 CMS profile 685323

7076 Corporate Way, Suite 201, Dayton, OH 45459

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,660

391 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$16

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$165,974 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Amol Soin of Dayton, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $17,660 across 391 general payments and $16 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $165,974 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,554 27
2024 General $1,300 26
2023 General $1,581 20
2022 General $5,056 35
2021 General $2,199 96
2021 Research $16 1
2020 General $3,602 76
2019 General $2,369 111

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amol Soin
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amol Soin were reported at $1,554. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Amol Soin Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,369 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $3,602 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $2,199 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $5,056 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $1,581 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $1,300 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $1,554 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Avanos Medical $5,903 19 payments
  2. Vertos Medical, Inc. $2,211 33 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $2,099 30 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,279 19 payments
  5. Nevro Corp. $813 15 payments
  6. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $548 61 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $432 36 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $415 21 payments
  9. Globus Medical, Inc. $387 4 payments
  10. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $372 7 payments
  11. Other $3,202 146 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,408 385 payments
  2. Honoraria $4,100 3 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $1,000 1 payment
  4. Travel and Lodging $152 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COOLIEF $2,800 2 payments
  2. ON-Q $2,300 2 payments
  3. mild Device Kit $1,962 28 payments
  4. PROCLAIM $914 7 payments
  5. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $573 8 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $517 27 payments
  7. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $473 11 payments
  8. EMGALITY $432 36 payments
  9. Senza $387 4 payments
  10. StimQ Freedom-8A Receiver Kit Channel A US w/ Receiver $378 3 payments
  11. Other $9,133 351 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $16 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

532

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$7,869

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lidocaine Generic 26 $3,101
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 86 $855
Nabumetone Generic 64 $666
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 28 $570
Cephalexin Generic 77 $506
Methocarbamol Generic 26 $431
Amitriptyline Hcl Generic 26 $331
Etodolac Generic 12 $323
Gabapentin Generic 30 $260
Methylprednisolone Generic 40 $251

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$359,545

Of which drugs: $31,118

Medicare patients

831

Average age 73

Services billed

15,487

529 women, 302 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 37%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Heart failure 21%
Osteoporosis 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $19
$19 — —
ZTLido
  • Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

392 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record