Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amit Shah

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Tuscaloosa, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1275503948 CMS profile 513090

701 University Blvd E, Suite 400, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$45,710

598 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Amit Shah of Tuscaloosa, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $45,710 across 598 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,662 79
2024 General $2,347 67
2023 General $16,355 78
2022 General $4,048 55
2021 General $6,615 100
2020 General $5,708 98
2019 General $3,975 121

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amit Shah
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amit Shah were reported at $6,662. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Amit Shah Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,975 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $5,708 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $6,615 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $4,048 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $16,355 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $2,347 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $6,662 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $20,924 51 payments
  2. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $14,791 41 payments
  3. Abbott Laboratories $2,054 34 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,029 199 payments
  5. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $1,713 7 payments
  6. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $1,070 64 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $585 51 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $577 44 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $284 15 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $260 16 payments
  11. Other $1,422 76 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $17,400 16 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $15,781 29 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $9,385 548 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $3,125 2 payments
  5. Education $19 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LifeVest $14,791 41 payments
  2. Micra Pacemakers $10,241 8 payments
  3. EVERA MRI XT DR SURESCAN $1,778 10 payments
  4. MICRA Pacemakers $1,645 5 payments
  5. ENTRESTO $1,349 121 payments
  6. UPTRAVI $907 55 payments
  7. OPSUMIT $857 52 payments
  8. AVEIR Cardiac Rhythm Management $750 10 payments
  9. AVEIR Cardiac Rhythm Management $738 6 payments
  10. XARELTO $585 51 payments
  11. Other $4,749 285 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 57 drugs

Part D claims

4,861

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$2,783,336

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

43.2%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 772 $748,650
Adempas Riociguat Brand 31 $437,603
Uptravi Selexipag Brand 14 $298,002
Opsumit Macitentan Brand 22 $267,134
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 266 $231,495
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 170 $191,923
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 165 $190,413
Letairis Ambrisentan Brand 13 $158,599
Ambrisentan Generic 21 $84,087
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 45 $46,495

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 57 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 95 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$288,144

Of which drugs: $2,304

Medicare patients

1,175

Average age 75

Services billed

5,408

608 women, 567 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Atrial fibrillation 56%
Diabetes 42%
Heart failure 41%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
COPD 32%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 59 236 $1,434
Injection, aminophyllin, up to 250 mg J0280 Office 30 30 $156

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $161
$161 — —
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $101
$101 — —
MULTAQ
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $77
$77 170 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $44
$44 — —
ENTRESTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $40
$40 165 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

598 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record