Who Paid My Doc
Amit Alexander Nathani
Sports Medicine Santa Barbara, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1144583428 CMS profile 680972
401 E Carrillo St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
General payments
$519,013
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$509,185
Research they led as principal investigator
$122,658
Through program year 2025, Amit Alexander Nathani of Santa Barbara, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $519,013 across 267 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $122,658 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $509,185 across 6 holdings.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
11 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $51,696 | 32 | |
| 2024 | General | $67,117 | 59 | |
| 2023 | General | $269,192 | 81 | |
| 2022 | General | $76,295 | 33 | |
| 2021 | General | $45,305 | 28 | |
| 2020 | General | $7,509 | 17 | |
| 2019 | General | $1,899 | 17 | |
| 2025 | Ownership | $215,089 | 1 | |
| 2023 | Ownership | $189,122 | 1 | |
| 2022 | Ownership | $1,532 | 1 | |
| 2021 | Ownership | $103,442 | 3 |
Beside peers
- Amit Alexander Nathani
- Sports Medicine median
- Middle half of Sports Medicine
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Amit Alexander Nathani were reported at $51,696. Among 2,404 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $664 and the middle half received between $172 and $3,055.
Show as a table
| Year | Amit Alexander Nathani | Sports Medicine median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $1,899 | $1,176 | $199–$4,249 | $163 |
| 2020 | $7,509 | $708 | $96–$2,890 | $114 |
| 2021 | $45,305 | $1,213 | $152–$3,994 | $132 |
| 2022 | $76,295 | $1,230 | $159–$3,998 | $149 |
| 2023 | $269,192 | $584 | $146–$2,836 | $160 |
| 2024 | $67,117 | $628 | $163–$3,168 | $164 |
| 2025 | $51,696 | $664 | $172–$3,055 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 7 drugsPart D claims
245
Drug cost
$4,831
Branded share of claims
42.9%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celecoxib | Generic | 68 | $3,111 | |
| Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen | Brand | 61 | $681 | |
| Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen | Brand | 44 | $460 | |
| Diclofenac Sodium | Generic | 14 | $425 | |
| Meloxicam | Generic | 34 | $116 | |
| Tramadol Hcl | Generic | 11 | $32 | |
| Amoxicillin | Generic | 13 | $6 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,934 Part D prescribers listed as Orthopedic Surgery; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 83 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$331,767
Medicare patients
489
Services billed
27,663
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis | 75% | |
| High blood pressure | 61% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 20% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 20% | |
| Depression | 20% | |
| Osteoporosis | 20% | |
| Diabetes | 19% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 14% |
| Drug given in the clinic | Where | Patients | Services | Paid by Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronan or derivative, triluron, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7332 | Office | 69 | 6,289 | $51,014 |
| Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 | Office | 146 | 18,648 | $1,911 |
| Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 | Office | 55 | 63 | $484 |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
267 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Sports Medicine in California
Related records
Sports Medicine in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Sports Medicine
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.