Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ambika Uppu

Family Medicine Reno, NV Medical Doctor

NPI 1821285784 CMS profile 174040

7111 S. Virginia Suite A7, Reno Family Physicians, Reno, NV 89511

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,969

644 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ambika Uppu of Reno, NV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,969 across 644 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,652 90
2024 General $1,717 82
2023 General $1,469 75
2022 General $1,585 119
2021 General $1,682 101
2020 General $1,549 93
2019 General $1,315 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ambika Uppu
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ambika Uppu were reported at $1,652. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Ambika Uppu Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,315 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $1,549 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,682 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,585 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,469 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,717 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,652 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,182 50 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,082 88 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma US Inc $1,026 41 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $986 52 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $857 52 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $547 65 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $476 32 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $452 37 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $407 18 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $381 22 payments
  11. Other $3,573 187 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,631 628 payments
  2. Education $338 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $940 36 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $639 28 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $608 53 payments
  4. SHINGRIX $434 32 payments
  5. Kerendia $407 18 payments
  6. MYRBETRIQ $407 22 payments
  7. BEXSERO $366 27 payments
  8. Veozah $365 16 payments
  9. Vascepa $321 24 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $311 15 payments
  11. Other $8,997 591 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 102 drugs

Part D claims

6,252

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$644,697

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

18.4%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 93 $124,796
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 73 $119,205
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 55 $57,301
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 42 $53,770
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 21 $47,072
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 29 $28,797
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 23 $26,801
Nexletol Bempedoic Acid Brand 23 $20,648
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 18 $20,590
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 13 $15,771

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 102 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$198,665

Of which drugs: $14,999

Medicare patients

683

Average age 75

Services billed

3,026

441 women, 242 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 33 33 $9,528
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 70 70 $5,410
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 15 $11

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $226
$226 — —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $195
$195 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $162
$162 55 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $79
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $34
$113 42 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $110
$110 93 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

644 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Nevada

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record