Who Paid My Doc
Amanda Aycock
Physician Assistant Easley, SC Physician Assistant
NPI 1497449169 CMS profile 11572794
115 Whitmire Rd, Easley, SC 29640
General payments
$637
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Amanda Aycock of Easley, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $637 across 23 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 60th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
2 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $546 | 19 | |
| 2024 | General | $90 | 4 |
Beside peers
- Amanda Aycock
- Physician Assistant median
- Middle half of Physician Assistant
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Amanda Aycock were reported at $546. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.
Show as a table
| Year | Amanda Aycock | Physician Assistant median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | $34 | $17–$122 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $33 | $16–$78 | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $132 | $37–$438 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $155 | $48–$522 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $167 | $52–$557 | $160 |
| 2024 | $90 | $178 | $55–$600 | $164 |
| 2025 | $546 | $184 | $57–$620 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$564,673
Medicare patients
51
Services billed
776
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Arthritis | 63% | |
| Depression | 59% | |
| Heart failure | 55% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 55% | |
| Diabetes | 51% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 41% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 39% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
23 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Physician Assistant in South Carolina
Benjamin Addy
Physician Assistant · West Columbia, SC
Michael Overcash
Physician Assistant · Charleston, SC
Allison Lester
Physician Assistant · Mt Pleasant, SC
Nicole Keeter
Physician Assistant · Fort Mill, SC
William Young
Physician Assistant · Greenville, SC
Stephanie Davis
Physician Assistant · Anderson, SC
Related records
Physician Assistant in South Carolina
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Physician Assistant
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in South Carolina
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.