Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alicia Lowes

Pediatric Endocrinology Akron, OH Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1154510683 CMS profile 652549

1 Perkins Sq, Akron, OH 44308

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,068

69 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alicia Lowes of Akron, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,068 across 69 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Pediatric Endocrinology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $222 9
2024 General $70 4
2021 General $59 6
2020 General $165 12
2019 General $552 38

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alicia Lowes
  • Pediatric Endocrinology median
  • Middle half of Pediatric Endocrinology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alicia Lowes were reported at $222. Among 971 Pediatric Endocrinology profiles paid that year, the median was $293 and the middle half received between $106 and $1,640.

Show as a table
Year Alicia Lowes Pediatric Endocrinology median Middle half National median
2019 $552 $196 $68–$845 $163
2020 $165 $124 $37–$722 $114
2021 $59 $134 $35–$691 $132
2022 $0 $177 $47–$726 $149
2023 $0 $236 $75–$887 $160
2024 $70 $259 $91–$979 $164
2025 $222 $293 $106–$1,640 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Insulet Corporation $325 17 payments
  2. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $182 19 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $144 6 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $69 4 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $65 4 payments
  6. LifeScan, Inc. $52 4 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $50 3 payments
  8. Dexcom, Inc. $39 2 payments
  9. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. $34 2 payments
  10. IBSA Pharma Inc. $26 2 payments
  11. Other $83 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,036 68 payments
  2. Education $32 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Omnipod Insulin Pump $185 15 payments
  2. Omnipod Insulin Pump $139 2 payments
  3. t-slim insulin pump Endocrinology $70 6 payments
  4. Victoza $54 2 payments
  5. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $45 6 payments
  6. t-slim insulin pump Endocrinology $44 5 payments
  7. GENOTROPIN $44 3 payments
  8. LUPRON DEPOT $41 2 payments
  9. DEXCOM CGM $39 2 payments
  10. FreeStyle Libre 3 $39 2 payments
  11. Other $411 27 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

69 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record