Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Aliaksandr Trusau

Internal Medicine Green Bay, WI Medical Doctor

NPI 1538542089 CMS profile 4445513

2793 Lineville Rd, Green Bay, WI 54313

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,743

26 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$14,343

Paid to them · 15 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,519,475 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Aliaksandr Trusau of Green Bay, WI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,743 across 26 general payments and $14,343 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,519,475 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $268 4
2024 General $1,202 18
2024 Research $7,851 1
2023 General $272 4
2023 Research $2,398 12
2022 Research $3,378 1
2021 Research $716 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Aliaksandr Trusau
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Aliaksandr Trusau were reported at $268. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Aliaksandr Trusau Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $0 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $0 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $272 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,202 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $268 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $684 14 payments
  2. Dexcom, Inc. $376 5 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $300 1 payment
  4. Abbott Laboratories $243 2 payments
  5. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $93 1 payment
  6. Amgen Inc. $48 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $826 12 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $617 13 payments
  3. Honoraria $300 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. DEXCOM G7 GSS (161) $223 2 payments
  2. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $153 3 payments
  3. FreeStyle Libre 3 $123 1 payment
  4. FreeStyle Libre 2 $119 1 payment
  5. DEXCOM STELO GLUCOSE BIOSENSOR $114 1 payment
  6. Edwards SAPIEN 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve $93 1 payment
  7. Otezla $48 3 payments
  8. REPATHA Cardiovascular $31 2 payments
  9. Repatha Cardiology $17 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $12,595 4 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $1,748 11 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 126 drugs

Part D claims

6,580

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$616,695

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 101 $92,262
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 53 $77,345
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 45 $67,683
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 42 $50,718
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 28 $31,962
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 29 $31,080
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 35 $27,784
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 25 $19,746
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 21 $18,645
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 16 $16,629

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 126 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$41,430

Of which drugs: $4,653

Medicare patients

207

Average age 74

Services billed

843

91 women, 116 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Diabetes 33%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Heart failure 21%
Cancer 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 21 21 $1,718

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $9
$9 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $9
$9 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

41 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Wisconsin

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record