Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alhashmin Murji

Physician Assistant San Antonio, TX Physician Assistant

NPI 1669647806 CMS profile 5911079

18626 Hardy Oak Blvd Ste 103, San Antonio, TX 78258

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$28,533

420 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alhashmin Murji of San Antonio, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $28,533 across 420 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,804 33
2024 General $8,417 47
2023 General $10,755 110
2022 General $3,632 120
2021 General $1,912 109
2020 General $14 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alhashmin Murji
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alhashmin Murji were reported at $3,804. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Alhashmin Murji Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $14 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,912 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $3,632 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $10,755 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $8,417 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $3,804 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $10,145 69 payments
  2. Nevro Corp. $9,261 34 payments
  3. Globus Medical, Inc. $2,948 5 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $1,568 82 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $645 37 payments
  6. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $421 44 payments
  7. MML US, Inc. $383 4 payments
  8. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $331 11 payments
  9. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $264 10 payments
  10. Davol Inc. $242 8 payments
  11. Other $2,328 116 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $9,218 372 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $5,698 4 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,250 17 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $4,963 20 payments
  5. Consulting Fee $3,290 5 payments
  6. Education $115 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $3,381 7 payments
  2. Omnia $3,313 3 payments
  3. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $2,948 5 payments
  4. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulator $2,567 24 payments
  5. Spectra WaveWriter $1,271 2 payments
  6. PROCLAIM $795 38 payments
  7. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $610 20 payments
  8. UBRELVY $570 33 payments
  9. AJOVY $421 44 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $412 15 payments
  11. Other $4,733 215 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

921

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$35,103

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

13.6%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Belbuca Buprenorphine Hcl Brand 24 $21,043
Tramadol Hcl Generic 274 $2,736
Lidocaine Generic 27 $2,087
Acetaminophen-Codeine Acetaminophen With Codeine Brand 74 $1,943
Gabapentin Generic 137 $1,719
Tramadol Hcl Er Tramadol Hcl Brand 27 $1,493
Pregabalin Generic 114 $1,304
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 74 $1,211
Celecoxib Generic 26 $877
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 46 $338

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$90,588

Of which drugs: $947

Medicare patients

321

Average age 75

Services billed

2,083

190 women, 131 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 35%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Diabetes 31%
Heart failure 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 23 216 $19

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $21
$21 24 —
NUZYRA
  • Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $17
$17 — —
DALVANCE
  • AbbVie, Inc. $9
$9 — —
TEFLARO
  • AbbVie, Inc. $9
$9 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

420 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record