Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alfred Johnson

Internal Medicine Jefferson City, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1396900510 CMS profile 108308

1241 W Stadium Blvd, Jefferson City, MO 65109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,836

173 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$60,765 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Alfred Johnson of Jefferson City, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,836 across 173 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $60,765 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $697 38
2024 General $789 47
2023 General $447 25
2022 General $250 13
2021 General $150 10
2020 General $97 7
2019 General $405 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alfred Johnson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alfred Johnson were reported at $697. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Alfred Johnson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $405 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $97 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $150 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $250 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $447 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $789 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $697 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $619 32 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $523 39 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $293 19 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $158 10 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $148 9 payments
  6. Dexcom, Inc. $142 6 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $119 8 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $106 8 payments
  9. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $83 3 payments
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $54 3 payments
  11. Other $591 36 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,836 173 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $412 20 payments
  2. QULIPTA $375 18 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT $291 21 payments
  4. ZAVZPRET $291 21 payments
  5. BEXSERO $233 15 payments
  6. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $142 6 payments
  7. SHINGRIX $118 8 payments
  8. Ozempic $112 7 payments
  9. COLOGUARD $98 9 payments
  10. EVENITY $87 5 payments
  11. Other $1,998 131 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 124 drugs

Part D claims

6,373

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$446,251

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 109 $119,800
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 63 $65,891
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 28 $39,000
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 24 $31,457
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 26 $26,061
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 24 $19,981
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 14 $12,823
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 12 $10,338
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 11 $8,831
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 40 $8,199

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 124 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 62 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$60,979

Of which drugs: $12,093

Medicare patients

169

Average age 71

Services billed

2,074

72 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
COPD 12%
Chronic kidney disease 11%
Cancer 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 25 26 $3,826
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 40 40 $3,263

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $100
$100 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $83
$83 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $68
$68 — —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $68
$68 — —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $50
$50 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

173 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record