Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexandru Costea

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Cincinnati, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1972551190 CMS profile 44380

2123 Auburn Ave Ste 137, Cincinnati, OH 45219

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$187,612

351 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$525

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$341,590 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Alexandru Costea of Cincinnati, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $187,612 across 351 general payments and $525 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $341,590 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $37,295 58
2024 General $11,059 16
2023 General $4,945 15
2022 General $38,108 76
2022 Research $525 1
2021 General $21,754 68
2020 General $27,909 38
2019 General $46,542 80

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexandru Costea
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexandru Costea were reported at $37,295. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Alexandru Costea Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $46,542 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $27,909 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $21,754 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $38,108 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $4,945 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $11,059 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $37,295 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biotronik Inc. $96,484 148 payments
  2. Biosense Webster, Inc. $67,584 84 payments
  3. Abiomed $9,973 10 payments
  4. Atricure, Inc. $6,534 25 payments
  5. Baylis Medical Company Inc $1,900 1 payment
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,638 20 payments
  7. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $1,330 6 payments
  8. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $957 8 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $473 16 payments
  10. Cardiva Medical, Inc. $277 9 payments
  11. Other $463 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $75,983 82 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $46,900 18 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $25,700 11 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $11,654 230 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $10,000 5 payments
  6. Grant $9,500 3 payments
  7. Honoraria $7,800 1 payment
  8. Education $75 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carto 3 $45,800 40 payments
  2. BioMonitor $18,973 37 payments
  3. Solia $18,827 35 payments
  4. Acticor $15,469 38 payments
  5. Carto 3 System $14,532 22 payments
  6. Rivacor $12,769 36 payments
  7. Edora $12,769 36 payments
  8. Acticor 7 VR-T DX $12,298 4 payments
  9. Edora 8 DR-T $12,159 3 payments
  10. Rivacor 7 DR-T $12,159 3 payments
  11. Other $38,008 144 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biotronik Inc. $525 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

831

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$292,987

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

46.3%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 260 $237,384
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 59 $45,501
Enoxaparin Sodium Generic 30 $3,218
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 87 $3,153
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 147 $1,390
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 13 $342
Diltiazem 24hr Er Diltiazem Hcl Brand 18 $331
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 35 $322
Colchicine Generic 11 $316
Warfarin Sodium Generic 38 $306

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 70 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$253,142

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

471

Average age 76

Services billed

2,934

203 women, 268 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 75%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Arthritis 57%
Heart failure 47%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Diabetes 31%
COPD 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

352 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record